Disposed

G. Thulasamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Jul 2022WP/982/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition concerning non-payment of contract dues for construction works, the Single Judge directed the respondent authorities to complete verification within three weeks and pay the due amount within six weeks. Failure to verify within the stipulated time would mandate immediate payment without further delay.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to complete verification within three weeks and pay dues within six weeks, otherwise pay immediately without insisting on further verification.

G. Thulasamma, Vs The State of Andhra… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION No.982 of 2022

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

The petitioner had been awarded the contract for taking up the “Neeru-Chettu” programme for i) construction of check dam across Chinna gutta vanka near Rachakuntapalli Village in Vemula Mandal of YSR District, ii) Desilting of Chinnagutta Narava near Rachakuntapalli Village in Vemula Mandal of YSR Kadapa District iii) construction of check dam across Pedda vanka near Rachakuntapalli Village in Vemula Mandal of YSR District, vide Agreement Nos.1024/2018-19, dated 22.02.2019, 1036/2018-19, dated 22.02.2019, and 557/2018-19, dated 31.10.2018 respectively. After execution of the said works, a final bill for Rs.35,29,147/(Rs.8,50,338/- + Rs.8,20,432/- + Rs.9,86,652/- respectively) has been prepared and submitted to the concerned for payment. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner had approached this Court, by way of this writ petition.

¶4

It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sums of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.

¶5

¶6

RRR,J W.P.No. 982 of 2022

¶7

This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.

¶8

The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondent authorities are verifying the claims of the petitioner and would be in a position to make payment only after such verification is completed.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the verification process within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter to pay the amount due to the petitioner depending upon the outcome of the verification, within a period of six weeks. It is clarified that in the event of the verification process not being completed within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the respondents shall pay the amounts due to the petitioner, without insisting upon any further time for verification. It would also be open to the petitioner to agitate his/her/their claim for interest, if

¶10

¶11

RRR,J W.P.No. 982 of 2022

¶12

any payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶13

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶14

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.

¶15

08.07.2022 knl

¶16

¶17

RRR,J W.P.No. 982 of 2022

¶18

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶19

WRIT PETITION No.982 of 2022

¶20

08.07.2022

¶21

knl

G. Thulasamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Thulasamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K Venkata Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Vanteru.Jayachandrareddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Singamsetty.Venkateswararao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri Chetan Raju Pilla Vs Union of India

Chakali Venkateswarudu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Sri Chowdeswari Filling Station, Vs the Union of India