D. Nagaraju, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENT

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH^ROY

¶5

WRIT PETITION Nos: 10997. 18746. 19757, 23203, 23262,^{23762,26117,26233^} 26397, 26717, 29463. 30029. 30072, 31045, 31301, 31322, 31451, 32146. 33603. 33900. 33974. 35006. 36644, 37133 of 2014; 1677,^3402,5609, 6082, 6838, 7022, 7173, 12726. 13990, 14041, 14051, 14391.^16349,17217, 17.ZZ4, 20384, 21848. 23074. 25102. 27840. 28627, 29181. 31213, 31620, 363^ 34071 of 2015; 87. 2015, 3486, 6609, 15393, 15835. 15841, 15870, 15835, 15841, 15870. 17618 of 2016 and 16809 of 2022

¶6

WRIT PETITION No: 10997 of 2014

¶7

Between: Ande pedda Bujji, S/o. Pothu Raju, aged about 46 years^{R/o.VekanuruVillage,Avanigadda} Mandal, Krishna District.

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of A.P., Represented by its Superintendent^{ofPolice,Machilipatnam,} Krihna District 2. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Avanigadda, Krishna^District 3. The Station House Officer, Avanigadda Police Station,^{Avanigadda,KrishnaDistrict} ...Respondents

¶11

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in opening^{andcontinuingrowdysheet} against the petitioners in the 3'^'* respondent police^station is contrary to A.P. Police Standing Orders and also illegal, arbitrary and violate^{oftheRightsGuaranteedunder} Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents^{toclosetherowdysheet} forthwith.

¶12

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 13841 OF 2014)

¶13

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High^{Courtmaybepleasedtodirectthe3rd} respondent not to summon the petitioners to the police^{stationwithoutfollowingdue} process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G VAASUDEVUDU

¶15

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO: 18746 OF 2014

¶17

Between: Pothula Poorna Chandra Rao, S/o. Subba Rao, aged about 31 years, R/o. D.No. 26-25-23, Durga Vari Street, Gandhi Nagar, Vijayawada. ...Petitioner 1^ -ruHydera^bad°^rPradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^{HomeDepartment,} 2. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. 3. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. 4. Station House OfRcer, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada. ...Respondents

¶18

^ ^ i^der Article 226 of the Constitution of India^{prayingthatinthecircumstances} stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents ^ Rowdy Sheet pursuant to the proceedings of 3'’'^ respondent vide C.No. 27/ACPWZ/2014, dated 03.06.2014 as illegal arbitrary and consequently call the records and set aside the same.

¶19

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 23520 OF 2014^

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of 3'^'' respondent vide C.No. 27/ACP-WZ/2014, dated 03.06.2014 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶22

WRIT PETITION NO: 19757 OF 2014

¶23

Between: Saka Rajarao, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 39 years, Resident of D.NO. 18-165, Srinivasa Peta, Kothapeta village & Mandal, East Godavari^District. ...Petitioner

¶24

AND

¶25

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District,^AtKakinada. 2. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Amalapuram Division,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 3. The Circle Inspector Of Police, Ravulapalem Circle,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kothapeta Police Station,^EastGodavari District. ...Respondents

¶26

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequential direct the respondents to delete the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheet on the file of the 4“^ respondent station. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 24746 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to delete the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheet on the file of the 4''’ respondent station, pending disposal of above writ petition.

¶27

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.NARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶28

WRIT PETITION NO: 23203 OF 2014

¶29

Between:

¶30

Boya Thirumala, S/o. B.Thimmanna, Aged about 32 years, Agricutiurist, 2. Boya Hussain, S/o. B.Thimmanna, Aged about 29 years, Agricuturist. 3. Boya Pampaiah, S/o. Yapilaiah, Aged about 42 years. Agriculturist. 4. Boya Naga Raju, S/o. Pedda Gunteppa, Aged about 30 years. Agriculturist. 5. Boya Hanumanthu, S/o. Pedda Gunteppa, Aged about 32 years. Agriculturist. 6. Boya Gunteppa, S/o. Yapilaiah, Aged about 54 years. Agriculturist. 7. Boya Eranna, S/o. Pedda Gunteppa, Aged about 33 years. Agriculturist. 8. Boya Chukka Paramesh, S/o. Peddaiah, Aged about 32 years. Agriculturist. All are R/o. Nandavaram Village and Mandal, Kurnool^District.

¶31

...Petitioners

¶32

AND

¶33

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District. 4. The Station House Officer, Nandavaram Police Station, Nandavaram, Kurnool District.

¶34

...Respondents

¶35

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing Rowdy Sheets dated 01.12.2007 bearing Nos. 35 to 42 against the petitioners respectively as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheets dated 01.12.2007 bearing Nos. R.D. 35 to 42 opened against petitioners respectively and remove their names in the rowdy sheets.

¶36

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rwPMP. NO: 29081 OF 2014^

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheets dated 01.12.2007 bearing Nos. 35 to 42 opened against petitioners respectively, by removing their names in the rowdy sheets, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶39

WRIT PETITION NO: 23262 OF 2014

¶40

Between:

¶41

Bhuma Veera Bhadra Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, aged 45 years, Occ; Cultivation, R/o. W.Kottapalle, Dornipadu Mandal, Kurnool District.

¶42

Yeruva Prasad Reddy, S/o. Lakshmi Narayan Reddy, aged 40 years, Occ: Cultivation, Rio. Kothapalli, Kurnool District

¶43

Narreddula Maheswara Reddy, S/o. Narayana Reddy, aged 40 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Kothapalli, Kurnool District. ...Petitioners

¶44

AND

¶45

The S.H.O., Dornipadu Police Station, Kurnool District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda,^{KurnoolDistrict.} 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶46

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶47

...Respondents

¶48

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare action of the respondents in opening rowdy sheet against the petitioners^based on involvement in one Crime No. 33/2008 on the file of the 1st respondent police station and continuing the rowdy sheet even in spite of acquittal in the said crime in the year 2010 itself as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners in the 1®‘ respondent police station forthwith in the interest of justice.

¶49

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 29149 OF 20141

¶50

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disturb the personal liberty of the petitioners on the ground of pendency of the rowdy sheet in the 1^' respondent police station, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶51

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶52

WRIT PETITION NO: 23762 OF 2014

¶53

Between:

¶54

Syed Zilani @ Jhon, S/o. Khadar Valli, Muslim, aged about 30 years, R/o. Lambadipet, Vijayawada. ...Petitioner

¶55

AND

¶56

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad.

¶57

The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada. 3. Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada. 4. Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Vijayawada.

¶58

...Respondents

¶59

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening a Rowdy Sheet pursuant to the proceedings of 3'^'^ respondent vide C.No. 43/ACPWZ/2014, dated 11.06.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently call the records and set aside the same.

¶60

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rwPMP. NO: 29785 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may^{bepleasedtosuspendtheproceedingsof} respondent vide C.No. 43/ACP-WZ/2014, dated 11.06.2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶61

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶62

WRIT PETITION NO: 26117 OF 2014

¶63

Between:

¶64

Jinnala Jayaraju, s/o. late Mahalaxmi, Aged about 37 years, R/o. D.No.34-2-16, Ravulapalliveedhi, Gnanapuram, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam^District. ...Petitioner

¶65

AND

¶66

The Govt, of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶67

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North, Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Inspector of Police, CCRB, Visakhapatnam.

¶68

The Station House Officer, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam.

¶69

...Respondents

¶70

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned orders of the 2nd respondent in opening the rowdy sheet in C.No. 17/CCRB/ACP-N/2012 dated 30.09.2012 against the petitioner and continuing the same without application of mind in flagrant disregard to law, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently^{tosetasidethesame.}

¶71

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 32649 OF 2014^

¶72

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Police not to interfere with the freedom of life and liberty of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶73

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY

¶74

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶75

WRIT PETITION NO: 26233 OF 2014

¶76

Between:

¶77

Bantupalli Nagendra Ashok Shiva Kumar, S/o. Suryanarayana, aged: 32 years. Occupation: Business, R/o. H.No.9-50, Opposite Shivalayam, Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam - 530028 ...Petitioner

¶78

AND

¶79

The Govt, of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶80

Inspector of Police, III - Town Police Station, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3. Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban, East^{GodavariDistrict.}

¶81

...Respondents

¶82

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in opening rowdy sheet in the name of the petitioner in the III Town police station Rajahmundry in the year 2007 is highly arbitrary, bad and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to remove the rowdy sheet opened in the name of the petitioner from the III Town Police Station Rajahmundry. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 32807 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents and 2 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioner to remove rowdy sheet from the III Town police station Rajahmundry.

¶83

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶84

WRIT PETITION NO: 26397 OF 2014

¶85

Between:

¶86

P.Phanikrishna Reddy, S/o. Seshagiri Reddy, Aged about 34 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No. 7- 201, Main Bazar, Atmakur Town & Mandal, Nellore District.

¶87

...Petitioner

¶88

AND

¶89

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶90

The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, Nellore District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakuru, Nellore^District.

¶91

The Station House Officer, Atmakur Police Station, Atmakur, Nellore District.

¶92

...Respondents

¶93

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, Direction more particularly one the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not closing the Rowdy Sheet No. 36 opened on 17-03-2000 in spite the petitioner not being involved in any criminal case since past 13 years as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice.

¶94

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 33026 OF 2014^

¶95

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to close the Rowdy Sheet No. 36 opened on 17-03-2000 on the file of the 4th respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶96

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶97

WRIT PETITION NO: 26717 OF 2014

¶98

Between:

¶99

Biradavolu Vishnuvardhan Reddy, S/o. Rami Reddy, Hindu, aged 34 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Madamanur Village, Manubolu Mandal, SPSR Nellore^District . ...Petitioner

¶100

AND

¶101

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Secretary, Home Department, A.P Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶102

The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District,^Nellore 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gudur, SPSR Nellore^District. 4. The Station House Officer, Manubolu Police Station, Manubolu, SPSR Nellore District. ...Respondents

¶103

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 3rd respondent in directing the 4th respondent to open a rowdy sheet in his proceedings C.No. 925/ GL-SDOG/2001 dated 16.6.2001 and the further action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner though there are no criminal cases pending against him and the trivial cases filed against him ended in acquittal as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner consequently to set aside the above said order and close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein.

¶104

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 33397 OF 20141

¶105

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station pursuant to the opening of the rowdy sheet in the proceedings of the 3rd respondent herein in C.No. 925/GL-SDOG/2001 dated 16.6.2001 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

¶106

' /

¶107

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.SRIDHAR REDDY

¶108

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶109

WRIT PETITION NO: 29463 OF 2014

¶110

Between:

¶111

Makineedi Sridhar, S/o.M.Nageswara Rao, Aged about 28 years, Occ: Agriculture Krishnapuram Village, Thondangi Mandal, East Godavari District.

¶112

...Petitioner

¶113

AND

¶114

Station House Officer, Thondangi PS, East Godavari^District. 2. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram, East^{GodavariDistrict} 3. Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District,^Kakinada.

¶115

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its. Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶116

...Respondents

¶117

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet No.l against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, against law as well as principles of natural justice and consequently direct the l“ and 2"'^ respondents not to call and harass the petitioner under the guise of rowdy sheet being registered against petitioner.

¶118

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rWPMP. NO: 36823 OF 2014j

¶119

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1^‘ and 2 nd respondents not to call and harass the petitioner under the guise of rowdy sheet being registered against petitioner.

¶120

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶121

WRIT PETITION NO: 30029 OF 2014

¶122

Between:

¶123

Nadimidoddi Chakali Thirupataiah, S/o N.Ganganna, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 13-2-416, Ramachandra Nagar, Anantapuram, Anantapuram^Dist. ...Petitioner

¶124

AND

¶125

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.

¶126

The Superintendent of Police, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu^Dist. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District. 4. The Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapuramu District.

¶127

...Respondents

¶128

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to remove the name of the Petitioner from the Register of History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) of III Town Police Station Anantapuram, Anantapuram District declaring that the opening of History Sheet (Rowdy Sheet) and the continuation of Petitioner name in the History Sheet of III Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District is arbitrary contrary to the Police Standing Orders and violative of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India besides violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

¶129

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rWPMP. NO: 37522 OF 2014J

¶130

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 nd Respondent to dispose of the Representation dt; 10.03.2014 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 weeks, in the interest of justice.

¶131

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 47013 OF 20141

¶132

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the Document i.e..

¶133

':V

¶134

Photo copy of the Judgment in S.C.No.l73 of 1991 (P.R.C.No.30/90 of A.J.F.C.M., Anantapuram Cr.NO.5/90 of S.H.O. I Town Police Station, Anantapuram), dt:29.01.1992^by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Anantapuram, in the interest of justice.

¶135

Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶136

WRIT PETITION NO; 30072 OF 2014

¶137

Between:

¶138

M.Riyaz Basha, S/o Ali Saheb, APSRTC Employee, D.No.21/207/19/B,^{Mandagiri,Adoni,Kurnool} District.

¶139

...Petitioner

¶140

AND

¶141

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep. by its Secretary.

¶142

The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District.

¶143

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Adoni, Kurnool^District. 4. The Station House Officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, Adoni, Kurnool District.

¶144

...Respondents

¶145

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT^{OFMANDAMUS,declaringtheactionof} the respondents in opening Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner and not deleting name of the petitioner in rowdy sheet as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondents^toclosethe Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner.

¶146

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 37583 OF 2014J

¶147

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet opened against petitioner, pending disposal of above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶148

WRIT PETITION NO: 31045 OF 2014

¶149

Between:

¶150

C.Sanjeeva Kumar Reddy, S/o. Padmanabha Reddy, aged about 35 years, R/o. Gangavaram Village, Sirvel Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner

¶151

AND

¶152

The Station House Officer, Sirvel Police Station, Sirvel, Kurnool District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda,^Kurnool District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District

¶153

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶154

...Respondents

¶155

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ^ofMandamus to declare the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station on the ground that he is accused in crime No. 54/2014on the file of the 1st respondent police station as arbitrary, illegal and^{violationofarticle21oftheConstitutionof} India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station in the interest of justice.

¶156

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 38808 OF 2014j

¶157

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the ground of opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1^' respondent police station pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶158

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶159

WRIT PETITION NO: 31301 OF 2014

¶160

Between:

¶161

Vipparthi Phani Kumar, S/o.Late Prabhakar Rao, Occ:contractor, R/o.D.No.1-49, Vemagiri Kadiam Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶162

AND

¶163

The Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District,^Kakinada. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry^Rural,East Godavari^District. 4. The Station House officer, Kadiam Police Station, Kadiam, E.G.District.

¶164

...Respondents

¶165

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents in summoning the petitioner to the 4th respondent police station and threatening with dire consequences of opening of rowdy sheet against the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and in^{violationofArticle21} of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner except under due process of law.

¶166

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 39123 OF 2014j

¶167

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to summon him to the 4^*’ respondent police station without following due process of law.

¶168

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶169

WRIT PETITION NO: 31322 OF 2014

¶170

Between:

¶171

SAV Prasad, S/o Sivarama Krishna, Advocate, R/o Kothapeta Street, Yellamanchili post Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner

¶172

AND

¶173

The Govt, of A.P. rep. by Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Yellamanchili Town.

¶174

...Respondents

¶175

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order of the 3rd respondent dated 11-08-2014 by directing the 4th respondent to open rowdy sheet against the petitioner in spite of acquittal In all 3 cases as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of the Police Standing Orders.

¶176

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rwPMP. NO: 39149 OF 2014)

¶177

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to delete the petitioner name from the Rowdy^Sheet.

¶178

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A S C BOSE

¶179

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶180

WRIT PETITION NO: 31451 OF 2014

¶181

Between:

¶182

Dadda Brahmanandam, R/o Yanamadala village Yeddanapudi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner

¶183

AND

¶184

Q

¶185

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶186

The Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam Dsitrict. 3. The Station House Officer, Yeddanapudi Police Station,^Prakasam District.

¶187

...Respondents

¶188

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therev/ith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet bearing No.9 in the 3rd respondent police station, inspite of acquittal from the criminal cases and submitting the representation dt.9.6.2014, as being illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents herein to forthwith close the rowdy sheet No.9 opened against the petitioner in the 3rd respondent police station.

¶189

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 39318 OF 2014^

¶190

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3'’'’ respondent herein not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein in any manner, pending disposal of the main^{WritPetition.}

¶191

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶192

WRIT PETITION NO: 32146 OF 2014

¶193

Between:

¶194

Peru Somula Ramakrishna, S/o. Yerranna, Aged About 52 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 1- 293, Belum Singavaram(V), Kolimigundla(M), Kumool(D). ...Petitioner

¶195

AND

¶196

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶197

The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda,^{KurnoolDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool District.

¶198

...Respondents

¶199

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondent no. 2 in continuing the Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner on the file of the 4th respondent Police Station, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool District as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also Standing Order 602-1 of the A.P. Police Manual Part-1 Volume 2 and the consequently^{setasidethesame.} I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 40190 OF 2014') Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner on the file of the 4 th respondent Police Station, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool District; pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶200

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RACHNA S WADDEPALLI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶201

WRIT PETITION NO: 33603 OF 2014

¶202

Between:

¶203

Usman Gani Basha, S/o Umar Ali, aged about 42 years, R/o H.No. 44/143, 1 St Line, Prakash Nagar, Kurnooi Town. ...Petitioner

¶204

AND

¶205

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶206

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool^District. 3. The Station House Officer Kurnool II Town Police Station, Kurnool.

¶207

...Respondents

¶208

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents in not removing the rowdy sheet No. 757 opened against the petitioner in the 3'^'^ respondent police station, even after his acquittal from the criminal cases in Cr.No. 62/2007 and 356/2011, and no case is registered against the petitioner after the year 2011, as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to remove the rowdy sheet No.757 opened against the petitioner herein.

¶209

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 42032 OF 2014')

¶210

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3'''’ respondent herein not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein in any manner, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶211

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT Y RATNA PRABHA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶212

WRIT PETITION NO: 33900 OF 2014

¶213

Between:

¶214

Bhuma Venkata Nagi Reddy, S/o Bali Reddy, Aged about 52 years, Occ: MLA R/o Nandyal Kurnool District. ...Petitioner

¶215

AND

¶216

The Station House Officer II Town Police Station Nandyal, Kurnool District 2. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal Kurnool^District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool 4. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal, Secretary (Home Department) Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶217

...Respondents

¶218

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT^OF MANDAMUS^{todeclaretheactionof} the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1^‘ respondent Police Station even though the petitioner is not the habitual offender as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to Police Standing Order No. 601 and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently,, direct the respondents to close rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner in the 1st respondent Police Station forthwith in the interest of justice.

¶219

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 42411 OF 2014j

¶220

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner in the 1^' respondent Police Station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

¶221

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶222

WRIT PETITION NO: 33974 OF 2014

¶223

Between:

¶224

Sri Chowkala Brahmaiah (5) Naga Brahmaiah, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H No.4-140,Therala Village, Durgi Mandal Guntur District, A.P.

¶225

Korangi Sivaiah @ Shiva, S/o. Lalaiah, OccrAgriculture R/o. H N0.4-151/B, Therala Village, Durgi Mandal Guntur District, A.P. ...Petitioners

¶226

AND

¶227

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its PrI., Secretary, Department of Home, A.P Secretariat, Hyderabad,

¶228

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh Office at Guntur, A.P 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Gurajala Division, Guntur District, A.P 4. The Station House Officer, Durgi Police Station, Durgi, Guntur District, A.P-522 612

¶229

...Respondents

¶230

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate

¶231

writ, order or directions more particularly one in^{thenatureofWritof} Mandamus,^declaring the action of the respondents in opening the Rowdy^{SheetvideNo.21} &^23, dated. 28-112013 of Durgi Police Station, Guntur District, A.P., against the petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary and violating the articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet vide No.21 & 23 in Durgi Police Station, Guntur District, AP, opened against the petitioners and not^{tointerferewiththepersonallibertyof} the petitioners. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 42503 OF 2014^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioners in connection with the Rowdy sheet vide No. 21 & 23, dated.28-11-2013 of Durgi Police Station, Guntur District, A P, opened against the petitioners, pending disposal of the above^W.P.

¶232

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BETHI VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶233

WRIT PETITION NO: 35006 OF 2014

¶234

Between:

¶235

Chimata Anand Kumar @ Anand, S/o Ramarao, Occ: Attender, R/o Vengalrao Nagar, Peddakakani Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner

¶236

AND

¶237

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶238

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural Division, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The Station House Officer, Peddakakani Police Station, Peddakakani, Guntur District. ...Respondents

¶239

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein, in continuing the Rowdy Sheet No.37 against Petitioner is illegal, improper, unjust, contrary to law and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to dis continue the Rowdy sheet.

¶240

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 43796 OF 2014j

¶241

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein not to compel the petitioner herein to come to the Police Station, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶242

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIMHACHALAM BARAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶243

WRIT PETITION NO: 36644 OF 2014

¶244

Between:

¶245

Pydimalla Madhu, S/o.Raja Rao, Hindu Aged 27 years, Occ:Lorry Driver R/o.Yeclidha Village Near R.C.M. Church, Mandapeta Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner

¶246

AND

¶247

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District,^Kakinada. 3. The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram,^E.G.District 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Rural Police Station Mandapeta, E.G.District. ...Respondents

¶248

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in opening a rowdy sheet in Mandapeta Rural Police Station, E.G.District Andhra Pradesh as per the proceedings No.32/H.S/SDPO-RCPM/2014 dt. 10-09-

¶249

\1^

¶250

2014 issued by the 3rd respondent and continuing the same as contrary to the A.P. Police Standing Orders and violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rov/dy sheet.

¶251

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 45861 OF 2014^

¶252

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.4 not to insist or summon the petitioner to the police station without any reason or cause under the guise of opening of the rowdy sheet pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶253

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶254

WRIT PETITION NO: 37133 OF 2014

¶255

Between:

¶256

Kambala Lakshmana Rao, S/o. Sathiraju, Hindu, aged about 33 years, Occ: Business, R/o. Moolapeta Village, U.Kothapalli Mandal, East Godavari^District. ...Petitioner

¶257

AND

¶258

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶259

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District^atKakinada. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (Deputy Superintendent of Police) Kakinada SubDivision, Kakinada, East Godavari District.

¶260

The Station House Officer, U.Kothapalli Police Station,^{EastGodavariDistrict.}

¶261

...Respondents

¶262

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening a rowdy sheet as against the petitioner on the basis of Crime No.70 of 2008 of U.Kothapalli Police Station, East Godavari District as illegal arbitrary and in violation of fundamental rights, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently; (a) set-aside the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner; (b) award such reliefs including award of compensation for violation of the petitioner fundamental rights; and (c) and to grant such other reliefs in the interest of justice.

¶263

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 46460 OF 20141

¶264

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ respondent not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the basis of the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ^Petition.

¶265

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶266

WRIT PETITION NO: 1677 OF 2015

¶267

Between:

¶268

Ganjikunta Adheppa, S/o.Late G.Narsimappa, Aged about 54 years, R/o.Chintapali village, Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Petitioner

¶269

AND

¶270

The State of Andhra Pradesh, (Home) Rep By its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶271

The Superintendent of police, Anantapur, Anantapur^District.

¶272

The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural P.S Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District.

¶273

...Respondents

¶274

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not closing the Rowdy Sheet No. 146 opened on the petitioner name in Guntakal Police Station, Ananthapur District as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14,19,19(l)(g) and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close Rowdy Sheet No. 146 opened on the petitioner name in Guntakal Police Station, Ananthapur District

¶275

o

¶276

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 2242 OF 2015^

¶277

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station pending disposal of the main Writ Petition

¶278

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶279

WRIT PETITION NO: 3402 OF 2015

¶280

Between:

¶281

D.Madhu s/o DJangaiah, R/o.H.No. 45/24 K-17-5 Sri Krishna Colony Opp: Trinity School Kurnool, Kurnool district ...Petitioner

¶282

AND

¶283

State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad rep. by its Secretary.

¶284

The Superintendent of Police Kurnool District, Kurnool. 3. The sub-Divislonal Police Officer, Kurnool district. 4. The Inspector of Police IV Town Police station,^Kurnool. 5. The Station House Officer, II Town Police station,^Kurnool.

¶285

...Respondents

¶286

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet No.203 against the petitioner in the 4'’ respondent police station and subsequently transferred to respondent police and renumbered as Rowdy Sheet No. 778 and continuing the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, Article 19(l)(g) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 4513 OF 2015^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist for the presence of the petitioner in the police station by suspending the rowdy sheet No.203 of 4'’ respondent police station and transferred to 5'*' respondent police station and renumbered as Rowdy Sheet No. 778 pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶287

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶288

WRIT PETITION NO: 5609 OF 2015

¶289

Between:

¶290

Shaik Subhani, S/o. Mohammad Hussain, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Tailor, R/o. Door No.6-14, Nidumukkala village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

¶291

...Petitioner

¶292

AND

¶293

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶294

The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur Urban, Guntur^District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur West Division, Guntur District. 5. The Station House Officer, Old Guntur Police Station,^{GunturUrbanDistrict.}

¶295

...Respondents

¶296

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4‘^ respondent in opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner and interfering with the life and liberty, as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently quash the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner by the 4^'’ respondent.

¶297

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 7464 OF 20151

¶298

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos.3 to 5 not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶299

v-<br>

¶300

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶301

WRIT PETITION NO: 6082 OF 2015

¶302

Between:

¶303

Boya Hanumappa, S/o B. Thimmappa, Aged about 30 years, Paramandodi Village, Yemmiganur Mandal, Kurnool District.

¶304

...Petitioner

¶305

AND

¶306

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶307

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool^District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur, Kurnool^District. 4. The Sub- Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur Rural Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District.

¶308

...Respondents

¶309

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct more particularly one in the nature of the WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in calling to the police station very frequently without there being any justifiable reason and not furnishing the particulars of the rowdy sheet opened if any against the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 (1) (g), and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to call the petitioner to the police station on and off and also close the rowdy sheet if any opened against the petitioner as he is not involved in any^{criminalcase.}

¶310

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 8117 OF 2015^

¶311

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 4 herein not to call the petitioner to the police station on and off pending disposal of the W.P.

¶312

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B.PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶313

WRIT PETITION NO: 6838 OF 2015

¶314

Between:

¶315

M.Pulla Reddy, s/o. M.Siva Reddy, Aged about 32 years, OcciAgriculturist, ex-Director KDCC Bank, R/o. Krishnapuram village, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool^District. ...Petitioner

¶316

AND

¶317

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District,^Kurnool. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakur Division,^{KurnoolDistrict.} 4. The Station House Officer, Atmakur P.S., Kurnool^District.

¶318

...Respondents

¶319

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in opening the rowdy sheet No. 134 dated 24.12.2012 against the petitioner and continuing the same even though petitioner is not habitual offender nor committed any offences causing disturbance to public peace and tranquility whereas only by succumbing to political pressures, as illegal, violation of Article 14, 19 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 9103 OF 2015^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to harass, interfere with the personal life & liberty of the petitioner.

¶320

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.RATHANGA PANI REDDY

¶321

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶322

WRIT PETITION NO: 7022 OF 2015

¶323

Between:

¶324

J.Babuji Rao @ J. Babji, S/o J. Prasad Aged 40 years, R/o Rarnannapalem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District.

¶325

...Petitioner

¶326

AND

¶327

State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its. Principal Secretary Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶328

Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District,^Eluru.

¶329

Dy. Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem, West^{GodavariDistrict.}

¶330

Station House Officer, Jeelugumilli Police Station,^{WestGodavariDistrict.}

¶331

...Respondents

¶332

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature^of WRIT OF MANDAMUS^declaringthe action of the police authorities in opening and continuing a rowdy sheet / history sheet against the petitioner as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the authorities to close the rowdy sheet/ history sheet against the petitioner and inform the same to the higher authorities and to compensate him for the agony^{andtortureheunderwent.}

¶333

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 9343 OF 2015J

¶334

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restrain the Respondent authorities from summoning the petitioner to police station to sign on documents and from taking photograph of the petitioner for displaying it widely etc or for any other reason.

¶335

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶336

WRIT PETITION NO: 7173 OF 2015

¶337

Between:

¶338

Bhimavarapu Kotireddy, S/o Prasadareddy, aged about 49 years, resident of Kollipara Village and Mandal, Guntur District.

¶339

...Petitioner

¶340

AND

¶341

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶342

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District.

¶343

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur^District.

¶344

Sowmya Mishra, W/o Not known Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur District.

¶345

The Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural, Guntur District.

¶346

The Station House Officer, Kollipara Police Station,^GunturDist.

¶347

Rambabu, S/o Not known Sub Inspector of Police, Kollipora Police Station Kollipara Village and Mandal, Guntur District.

¶348

Tahsildar Cum Mandal Executive Magistrate, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District.

¶349

...Respondents

¶350

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 7 in calling the petitioner to police stations without issuing any summons, notices or memos etc and harass the petitioner in the name of counseling by taking signatures on blank papers and making to wait in the stations every time without any reference to time on the day when called or taken police stations without any or specific purpose as the same is arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and award damages/compensation against respondent no. 1 to 7 for their unlawful actions including opening of rowdy sheet and also against respondent No.8 for illegal and unauthorized binding over of the petitioner for good behavior Under Section 110 (e) of Cr.P.C. without any legal cause and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to 7 not to call the petitioner to the police stations.

¶351

Vvb

¶352

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 9560 OF 2015^

¶353

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 7 not to call the petitioner to the police stations pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶354

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶355

WRIT PETITION NO: 12726 OF 2015

¶356

Between: J.Jayaraju, S/o. J. Prakash Rao, Occupation - Self Employed Powerpeta, Ambica Vari Street Eluru 524002 West Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶357

AND

¶358

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By Its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶359

The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District^AtEluru. 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division,^AtEluru. 4. The SHO, Eluru II Town P.S., Eluru.

¶360

...Respondents

¶361

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents including the Orders in C.No. 02/SPDOE(E)/SHEETS/201⁵ Dtd. 15-01-2015 issued by the 3'^'^ respondent the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division, Eluru, in directing the 4th respondent SHO of Eluru II Town PS to open a Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner, and the Rowdy Sheet so opened and maintained, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice, besides being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also being violative of Standing Order 601 (A)(13)(E)(F) of the A.P. Police Manual Part-1 Volume 2 and consequently quash. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 16761 OF 2015^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Order in C.No. 02/SPDOE(E)/SHEETS/2015 dtd. 15-01-2015 issued by the 3rd respondent - the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division, Eluru, in directing the 4th respondent SHO of Eluru II Town PS to open a Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner, including suspension of the operation of the Rowdy Sheet so opened and maintained by the SHO., Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru.

¶362

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.PATTABHI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶363

WRIT PETITION NO: 13990 OF 2015

¶364

Between:

¶365

Shaik Lateef S/o Karim, R/o. Tipparla Bazar, Mangalagiri,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶366

...Petitioner

¶367

AND

¶368

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by, its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur. 3. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District.

¶369

...Respondents

¶370

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus,, to declare the action of the respondents in continuing Rowdy Sheet bearing No. 647/2003 opened against the petitioner basing on two criminal cases which were also ended in acquittal vide judgment in C.C.No. 280/2003 dt. 4-2-2003 and C.C.No. 364/2002 dt. 7-2-2005, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith

¶371

close the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein in the 3rd respondent police station bearing Rowdy Sheet No. 647/2003. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 18326 OF 2015^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the 3'^'’ respondent herein not to call the petitioner to the police station or interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner herein, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner; SMT P.HEMALALITHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶372

WRIT PETITION NO: 14041 OF 2015

¶373

Between:

¶374

Nettembaku Polaiah S/o.Venkata Subbaiah, Occ: Retd. RTC employee, R/o Peduru Village, T.P Gudur Mandal, SPSR Nellore Dist. ...Petitioner

¶375

AND

¶376

State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its. Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶377

Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore Dist.

¶378

Divisional Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore, Dist.

¶379

Inspector of Police, Krishnapatnam, SPSR Nellore Dist.

¶380

Station House Officer, T.P Gudur Police Station, SPSR^{NelloreDistrict.}

¶381

...Respondents

¶382

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in retention of the rowdy-sheet No. 26 of 2012 vide C.No.l07/GLSDO.N(R)/2012 dated 04.07.2012 on the petitioner respectively as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjustified and without jurisdiction and violative of the Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Orders and offends articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently quash the rowdy sheet and direct the respondents not to interfere with my liberty in any manner in the interest of justice.

¶383

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 18399 OF 2015j

¶384

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to enforce in any manner the Rowdy -Sheet No. 26 of 2012 dt. 04-07-2012 opened against me respectively including calling to the Police Station and not to pay domiciliary visits to my house, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶385

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶386

WRIT PETITION NO: 14051 OF 2015

¶387

Between:

¶388

Reddy Kiran Kumar @ Reddy Venkata Kiran Kumar, S/o. Jwala Narasimha Rao, aged 28 Years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/ o. H. No. 1-151, Savalyapuram Village & Mandal, Guntur District.

¶389

...Petitioner

¶390

AND

¶391

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶392

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur District. 3. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Narasaraopet, Guntur, Guntur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Savalyapuram Police Station,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶393

...Respondents

¶394

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheet vide No. 793/ SDPO/NRT/2014, dated 01.11.2014, by the 3rd Respondent under provisions of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Order No. 601 against the petitioner at Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District and its continuation as

¶395

illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and Set aside the same.

¶396

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 18411 OF 2015^

¶397

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the rowdy sheet vide No. 793/SDPO/NRT/2014, dated 01.11.2014, by the 3rd Respondent under provisions of Andhra Pradesh Police Standing Order No. 601 against the petitioner at Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District, pending disposal of the Writ petition.

¶398

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K V R KRISHNA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶399

WRIT PETITION NO: 14391 OF 2015

¶400

Between: Meejuru Mallikarjuna Rao @ Malli, S/o. Subramanyarn, Aged about 32 years, Occ: News Reporter, R/o. Harijanawada, Kota village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ...Petitioner

¶401

AND

¶402

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶403

1. The Director General of Police, Andhra, Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore^District. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudur Division, SPSR Nellore District. 5. The Station House Officer, Kota Police Station, SPSR Nellore District.

¶404

...Respondents

¶405

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in threatening the petitioner to come down to police station for taking finger prints, to take photograph by placing slate on the petitioner which will be written as rowdy sheeter to display in the police station and in other public places as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law.

¶406

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 18807 OF 201 SI

¶407

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd to 5th respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶408

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶409

WRIT PETITION NO: 16349 OF 2015

¶410

Between: Pilli Posa Rao, S/o.late Venkat Rao, Aged about 46 years, Tupakalagudem Village Tallapudi Mandal, W.G.District, A.P. ...Petitioner

¶411

AND

¶412

1. State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary to, the Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶413

1. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Kowur, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh 4. The Station House Officer, Tallapudi P.S, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶414

...Respondents

¶415

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or a direction more particularly in a nature of Writ of MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondents in opening rowdy sheet against the petitioner in 4^’’ respondent police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires the Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheets list in the 4'*' Respondent's Police Station.

¶416

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 21239 OF 2015^

¶417

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere \A/ith the personal life and liberty of the petitioner by calling him to the police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶418

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NARASIMHA RAO DAVULURI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶419

WRIT PETITION NO: 17217 OF 2015

¶420

Between:

¶421

Atchi China Narasimha Rao (gi China Babu, S/o Venkateswarlu, aged about 27 years, R/ o. BC Colony, Nandigama, Krishna District.

¶422

...Petitioner

¶423

AND

¶424

The Station House Officer Nandigama Police Station,^{KrishnaDistrict.} 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama,^{KrishnaDistrict.} 3. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶425

...Respondents

¶426

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ^{ofMandamustodeclaretheactionofthe} respondent No.l in opening the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 1st respondent police station and thereafter renewing the rowdy sheet and continuing the same by renewing mechanically without recording any reason even in spite of quashing in all the cases and no case is pending against the petitioner at the present as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to close the rowdy sheet pending against the petitioner in the 1^' respondent police station forthwith in the interest of justice.

¶427

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 22323 OF 2015j

¶428

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 1 not to summon the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law merely on the ground of pendency of the rowdy sheet pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶429

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY

¶430

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶431

WRIT PETITION NO: 17774 OF 2015

¶432

Between:

¶433

Seelam Mohan Kumar, S/o late Laxrnaiah, aged 39 years, R/o Lam Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District.

¶434

...Petitioner

¶435

AND

¶436

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶437

The Superintendent of Police (Urban), Guntur, Guntur^District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, North Sub-Division, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 4. The Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District

¶438

...Respondents

¶439

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner herein in 4 th respondent police station as illegal, contrary to law and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to withdraw the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner herein.

¶440

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 22984 OF 20151

¶441

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the rowdy sheet

¶442

<2P

¶443

opened and pending against the petitioner herein in 4*^ respondent police station, pending disposal of writ petition.

¶444

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K V VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶445

WRIT PETITION NO: 20384 OF 2015

¶446

Between: Thumma Babul Reddy, S/o. Brahma Reddy, aged 45 years, Occ : Agriculture, R/o. Railpet, Bapatia, Guntur District. ...Petitioner

¶447

AND

¶448

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, Guntur. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bapatia, Guntur^District. 4. The Inspector of Police, Bapatia Town Police Station,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶449

...Respondents

¶450

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in retaining the rowdy sheet No. 75 dated : 30.01.2004 opened against the petitioner in the 3''“ respondent Police Station as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015('WPMP. NO: 26258 OF 2015’> Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rowdy sheet No.75 dated : 30.01.2004 opened against the petitioner in Bapatia Town P.S., Guntur District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶451

Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT A.GAYATRI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶452

WRIT PETITION NO: 21848 OF 2015

¶453

Between:

¶454

Adaka Rattalu S/o. Venkaiah, Occ: Business, R/o.20-20-266, 9'*' Lane, Chuttugunta, Guntur City, Guntur District.

¶455

...Petitioner

¶456

AND

¶457

State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its. Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. Superintendent of Police, Guntur District at Guntur. 3. Sub-Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem P.S. Guntur.

¶458

...Respondents

¶459

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ/order/direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not closing the Rowdy Sheet No. 185/93 continuing against the petitioner in Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur District pursuant to representation dt. 10.12.2014 of him is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and in violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove the Rowdy Sheet No. 185/93 on the file of Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur against the petitioner.

¶460

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 28147 OF 2015^

¶461

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dt. 10-12-2014 of the petitioner for removing the Rowdy Sheet No. 185/93 on the file of the Nagarampalem Police Station, Guntur pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶462

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA

¶463

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶464

WRIT PETITION NO: 23074 OF 2015

¶465

Between:

¶466

Jangam Jagadeesh @ Matam Jagadeesh Swamy, S/o.Basavaraju Swamy, Age 32 years R/o.H.No 9-104, Siddappapalem, Kosigi (V) (M) ,Kurnool^{District-518313.} ...Petitioner

¶467

AND

¶468

The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

¶469

The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District,^Kurnool 3. The Station House Officer, KOSIGI Police Station, Kosigi (V) (M) ,Kurnool District518313.

¶470

...Respondents

¶471

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, writ or writs particularly in the nature of 'WRIT OF MANDAMUS' to declare the action of respondents in opening and continuing the rowdy sheet No.392 of 2008 of Kosigi Police Station, Kurnool District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and against the provisions as per the A.P. Police Manual and Article 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶472

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 29840 OF 20151

¶473

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the rowdy sheet No.392 of Kosigi Police Station, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.

¶474

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶475

WRIT PETITION NO: 25102 OF 2015

¶476

Between:

¶477

Valaparla Ramesh, S/o. Late Sri V.Mariyadasu, Aged about 36 years, R/o. D.No. 69-5-13/A Ambedkar Nagar, Patamata, Vijayawada - 520008 ...Petitioner

¶478

AND

¶479

The State of A.P., Rep. by PrI. Secretary, Home Department, A.P.Secreteriat, Hyderabad. 2. Deputy Commissioner of Police(D.C.P.), Law & Order, Police Commissionerate, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶480

Assistant Commissioner of Police (A.C.P.), Central Zone, Patamata Jurisdiction, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶481

Sub-Inspector of Police, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶482

...Respondents

¶483

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in opening rowdy sheet and being continued by the Respondents authorities against the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ultra vires of the Police Standing Orders, as otherwise the petitioner will suffer grave and irreparable loss. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 32573 OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith stop harassing the Petitioner to make his presence every week before the Respondents and task force office and to stop the Respondents authorities to harass the family members of the Petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CHATRATI RADHA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶484

WRIT PETITION NO: 27840 OF 2015

¶485

Between:

¶486

P. Subramanyam, S/o Subba Rayudu, Aged about 43 years R/o 28/1042, Saibaba Naqar Nandyal Kurnool District.

Qy

...Petitioner

AND

The station House Officer II, Town Police Station, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 2. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶491

...Respondents

¶492

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ^{ofMandamustodeclaretheactionofthe} respondents in opening Rowdy Sheet in the year 2006 on the ground that the petitioner is an accused in Cr.No. 51/2005 and continuing Rowdy Sheet in the respondent's police station by routinely extending the Rowdy Sheet without recording sufficient reasons as arbitrary and illegal and violation of Article 21 of Constitution, of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet pending against the petitioner in the 1^* respondent’s police station in the interest of justice.

¶493

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 36121 OF 20151

¶494

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station on the ground of pendency of the Rowdy Sheet in the 1^‘ respondent’s police station pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice.

¶495

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶496

WRIT PETITION NO: 28627 OF 2015

¶497

Between:

¶498

Khaleel, S/o.Sikindar, Aged about 22 years, Occ;Daily wage labour, R/o.Mosque Street,V.Kota Village and Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶499

...Petitioner

¶500

AND

¶501

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary ( Home Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶502

The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor^District.

¶503

The Station House Officer, V. Kota Police Station, V.Kota, Chittoor District.

¶504

...Respondents

¶505

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction declaring the action of the Respondent in opening a Rowdy Sheet and exhibiting the photograph of the petitioner in the list of Rowdy sheeters Board in the 3rd Respondent Police station as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and violation of the fundamental Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Chapter III of Constitution of India and also violation of Andhra Pradesh Police Manual Board Standing Orders and consequently direct the Respondents to close/quash the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner forthwith. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 37109 OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct stay of all further proceedings pursuant to opening of Rowdy Sheet against the petitioner in V.KOta Police Station, V.Kota, Chittoor District pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Hon’ble Court, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶506

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶507

WRIT PETITION NO: 29181 OF 2015

¶508

Between:

¶509

M. Lokeswararao S/o. Nageswararao, Occ: Self Employment R/o. N.P. Raju Colony, Chataparraju road, Venkatapuram Panchayat, Eluru rural and Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶510

n/>

¶511

AND

¶512

The State of A.P. rep by its Principal Secretary, Home, department, secretariat Buildings, A.P. Hyderabad.

¶513

The Superintendent of Police West Godavari District,^Eluru.

¶514

The Divisional Superintendent of Police Eluru, Eluru Sub, Sub Division, West Godavari District.

¶515

The Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru, West Godavari^Dist.

¶516

The Station House officer Eluru Rural Police Station, Eluru, West Godavari District.

¶517

The Station House Officer, I- Town Police Station Eiuru,^{WestGodavariDistrict.}

¶518

...Respondents

¶519

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the impugned rowdy sheet proceedings dt. 15.01.2015 is highly illegal arbitrary and violative of the article 14, 16 21 of the constitution of India apart from contrary to the police manual and set aside the same and consequently to suspend the impugned proceedings of the rowdy sheet dt. 15.01.2015.

¶520

I.A. NO; 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 37823 OF 20151

¶521

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings of the rowdy sheet dt. 15.01.2015 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶522

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T S N SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶523

WRIT PETITION NO: 31213 OF 2015

¶524

Between:

¶525

Tunga Nageswara Rao, S/o Thirumurthulu, Setti Balija by caste. Native of Gumparru Village, Yalamanchili Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶526

AND

¶527

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Home Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶528

Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru.

¶529

Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapuram Sub-Division, Narsapuram, West Godavari District.

¶530

Inspector of Police, Palakollu Rural Circle, Pallakollu,^{WestGodavariDistrict.}

¶531

Station House Officer, Elamanchili Police Station, Elamanchili, West Godavari District.

¶532

...Respondents

¶533

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring action of Respondents 4 & 5 in registering of false criminal cases repeatedly against petitioner, interfering into his personal life and liberty and also threatening to opening of rowdy sheet without following due process of law as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative Provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 4 & 5 not to interfere into the personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of^Law.

¶534

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 40346 OF 20151

¶535

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 4 & 5 not to interfere their personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law.

¶536

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO

¶537

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶538

WRIT PETITION NO: 31620 OF 2015

¶539

Between:

¶540

S.Durga Prasad, S/o Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 35 years, Occ:Business, R/o D.No.41 / 13/ 37, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Petitioner

¶541

AND

¶542

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶543

...Respondents

¶544

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.2 / Police in not closing the Rowdy Sheet against the Petitioner inspite of closure of C.C.No.l36/ 2007, on the file of II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada vide Lok Adalat award dt.20-06-2011 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 /police to close the Rowdy Sheet opened against the Petitioner in connection with FIR No. 18/2007.

¶545

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017fWPMP. NO: 23671 OF 2017^

¶546

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the direction petition vide WPMP No. 40883 of 2015 in WP^31620of2015.

¶547

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015rWPMP. NO: 40883 OF 20151

¶548

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No.2/Police not to insist for appearance of the Petitioner before the Police Station in connection with the Rowdy Sheet opened against him pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶549

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 44988 OF 20151

¶550

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased amend the cause title by substituting the "Machavaram Police Station" with that of "Krishnalanka Police Station m Respondent No.2.

¶551

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PSP SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)

¶552

WRIT PETITION NO: 36392 OF 2015

¶553

Between:

¶554

M/s Sri Chaitanya Real Estates, (Registered Partnership Firm) (Regd.No.06747/1991), Represented by its Managing Partner. Avula Veera Sekhar Rao, S/o.Veeraswamy, Hindu, Aged about 54 Years, R/o. H.No.3-30-40/A, Brundavan Gardens, 6*^ Line, Yadav Complex. Guntur, Guntur District. PIN:522006

¶555

Avula Veera Sekhar Rao, S/o.Veeraswamy, Hindu, Aged about 54 Years, R/o. H.No.3-3040/A, Brundavan Gardens, 6^'’ Line, Yadav Complex. Guntur, Guntur District. PIN:522006 ...Petitioners

¶556

AND

¶557

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary , Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶558

The Director General of Police Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

¶559

The Superintendent of Police, Guntur, Guntur, District .

¶560

The Station House Officer, Arundalpet Police, Station,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶561

Ala.Suhasini., W/o.Uday Kiran, Hindu, Aged 34 Years, Rio. Poranki Village, Near Sai Baba Temple, Vijayawada Rural., Krishna District.

¶562

...Respondents

¶563

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any Appropriate Writ by declaring the Second And Third Respondents in not Considering the representation made by the Petitioner, Dated 03-11-2015, in which they requested to take Action against the Respondent No-4, who is threatening the Petitioner, to Settle the Civil Dispute, which was turned into a Crime by registering the F.I.R.No. 418/2015, Dated 17-102015, Before the Fourth Respondent, and Threatening the Petitioner by saying that, they will

¶564

Register 40 to 50 similar Crimes by tracing out all those defaulters of Petitioners Firm, and also will Open a Rowdy sheet against the Petitioner, is illegal. Contrary to Provisions of Cr.P.C, Contrary to Articles 14, 16, 19,20 and 21 of Constitution of India, contrary to the Judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of India, and against the principals of natural justice. Consequently to direct the fourth Respondent, not to harass the Petitioner to Settle the Disputes with the Fifth Respondent in connection with Civil Dispute, which was Colored as Criminal in nature and Registered as F.I.R.No.418/2015.

¶565

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 46866 OF 20151

¶566

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Fligh Court may be pleased to Direct the Fourth Respondent, not to harass the petitioner to Settle the Disputes with the Fifth Respondent in connection with Civil Dispute, which was Colored as Criminal in nature and Registered as F.I.R.No.418/2015.

¶567

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶568

WRIT PETITION NO: 34071 OF 2015

¶569

Between:

¶570

K. Ramalinga Reddy, S/o Rami Reddy, Aged about 43 Yrs, R/o Matherimitta Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶571

K. Manoj Kumar @ Manoj, S/o Munirathnam Reddy, Aged about 25 Yrs, R/o Matheiimitta Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶572

Krishnamurthy, S/o Govinda Reddy, Aged about 42 Yrs, R/o Chilamathur Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District.

¶573

K. Munirathnam Reddy, S/o Chenga Reddy, Aged about 56 Yrs, R/o Matherimitta Village, Varadaiahpalem Mandal, Chittoor District. ...Petitioners

¶574

AND

¶575

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶576

The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor District.

¶577

The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati Urban Police District, Chittoor District.

¶578

The Sub-Division Police Officer, Srikalahasti, Chittoor^District.

¶579

The Sub-Division Police Officer, Puttur, Chittoor District.

¶580

The Station House Officer, Varadaiah Palem Police Station,^{ChittoorDistrict.}

¶581

...Respondents

¶582

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in opening the rowdy sheets against the petitioners vide Proceeding No. C.No.94/SDPO(K)/09, dt.25.07.2009 is illegal, arbitrary^{andviolativeofArticles14and21of} the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheets against the petitioners.

¶583

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015rwPMP. NO: 43866 OF 2015'>

¶584

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioners to the police station for signing the register and not to exhibit the photos of the petitioners in the police station, pending disposal of Writ Petition.

¶585

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶586

WRIT PETITION NO: 87 OF 2016

¶587

Between:

¶588

D. Nagaraju, S/o. D. Narayanaswamy, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Business, Proprietor of Nandavanam Chowdeshwari Silks Pvt. Ltd., R/o. 4/497, Santhinagar, Dharmavaram Town Anantapur District. ...Petitioner

¶589

AND

¶590

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Chittoor, Chittoor^District.

¶591

<5^

¶592

The Sub-divisional Police Officer, Madanapalle,^{ChittoorDistrict.} 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalle, Rural Police Station, Madanapalle, Chittoor District.

¶593

The Station House Officer, Mudivedu Police Station,^{MudiveduChittoorDistrict.}

¶594

...Respondents

¶595

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in opening rowdy sheet vide No.482 on the file of the Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu, Chittoor District against the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and consequently quash the same.

¶596

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 119 OF ZOlSf

¶597

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 5, not to call the petitioner to Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu, Chittoor District under the guise of rowdy sheet No.482, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶598

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶599

WRIT PETITION NO: 2015 OF 2016

¶600

Between:

¶601

Garaga Veera Ganeswara Rao @ Ganesh, S/o Venkateswara Rao, aged about 29 years; Caste; Kapu, occu: Finance Badness; R/o D.No. 13-07-09, Kondapalli Mari Street, Mandapeta, East Godavari District.

¶602

...Petitioner

¶603

AND

¶604

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶605

The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari at Kakinada,^{AndhraPradesh.} 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Circle, Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 4. The Station House Officer, Mandapeta Town P.S., Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 5. The Station House officer, Manda peta I Town PS., Mandapeta, East Godavari District.

¶606

...Respondents

¶607

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the Police Stations of Mandapeta town. East Godavari District and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet kept against the petitioner in the police stations of Mandapeta, East Godavari District in the interest of justice

¶608

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016<'WPMP. NO: 2553 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police stations of Mandapeta, East Godavari District frequently and make his to wait for hours together pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶609

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SWARNA SRINIVAS BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶610

WRIT PETITION NO: 3486 OF 2016

¶611

Between:

¶612

P. Surya Narayana Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, aged 55 years, Occ: Advocate, R/o. Balaii Naqar Allagadda, Kurnool District. j y / ...Petitioner

¶613

AND

¶614

1. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Town Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool District 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶615

...Respondents

¶616

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents in intending to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No. 157/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police station as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to police standing order No.601 and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner contrary to the procedure prescribed in Police standing Order No. 601 in the interest of justice.

¶617

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 4455 OF 2016’>

¶618

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to open the rowdy sheet against the petitioner contrary to the procedure prescribed in Police standing Order No. 601 pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.

¶619

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B SARVOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶620

WRIT PETITION NO: 6609 OF 2016

¶621

Between:

¶622

Y. Bali Reddy, S/o Nagireddy, Aged about 28 years, R/o D No; 3/43, Badsha Banda Street, Patha Kadapa, Kadapa City, YSR Kadapa District. ...Petitioner

¶623

AND

¶624

The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal, Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

¶625

The Sub Inspector of Police, C K Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District 3. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.

¶626

...Respondents

¶627

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue appropriate Writ or order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in opening and continuing of Rowdy Sheet No. 74 against the petitioner in the Respondent C K Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District, as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unfair, unjustified and direct the Respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet forthwith against the petitioner.

¶628

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 8415 OF 2016^

¶629

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased direct the Respondents not to act upon the Rowdy Sheet No. 74, against the petitioner maintained in the 2"'^ Respondent C.K. Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District.

¶630

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶631

WRIT PETITION NO: 15393 OF 2016

¶632

Between:

¶633

Kakaraparthi Rama Rao S/o Ramanjaneyulu @ Hanumahtha Rao, Resident of Machavaram village, Machavaram Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The state of A.P rept by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Sub- Divisional Police, Officer Machavaram Sub Division Guntur District.. 3. The S.H.O. Machavaram P.S., Machavaram Mandal, Gutnur District.

¶634

...Respondents

¶635

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 &.3 herein, in opening and continuing the Rowdy Sheet bearing No. 157, dt.l.11.2014, on the file of Machavaram P. S, against the petitioner herein, as illegal’

¶636

arbitrary, in breach of Police Standing Orders, discriminatory, in vioiation of Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and. contrary to the settled legal principles and consequently direct the respondents herein, to close the Rowdy Sheet bearing No.157, dt.1.11.2014, in Machavaram police station against the petitioner herein^forthwith. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 19076 OF 2016^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to summon the petitioner herein, to the police station, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶637

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA RAO MAVIDI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶638

WRIT PETITION NO: 15835 OF 2016

¶639

Between:

¶640

Korukonda Srinivas, S/o Abbal (late), aged about 31 years, Occ:Cultivation, Cultivation, R/o Maminipalem village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam^District. ...Petitioner

¶641

AND

¶642

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶643

The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural Visakhapatnam District, A.P

¶644

The Addl.Superintendent of Police (Administration), HAC Anakapalli Sub. Division, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

¶645

The Station House Officer, Anakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

¶646

...Respondents

¶647

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the 3'’^' respondent in permitting the 4th respondent to open a rowdi sheet against the petitioner vide order in C.No.l9/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AF.P-2011 dt.19-11-2014 as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to law and police manual and also violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to discontinue the rowdy sheet and pass

¶648

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19575 OF 2016^

¶649

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with my life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet against me pending disposal of the above W.P. pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶650

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S SRINIVASA RAO

¶651

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶652

WRIT PETITION NO: 15841 OF 2016

¶653

Between:

¶654

Pudi Ramana, S/o Chinna Raju, aged about 38 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Mamidipalem Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

¶655

...Petitioner

¶656

AND

¶657

The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam Rural Visakhapatnam District, A.P 3. The Addl. Superintendent of Police (Administration), HAC Anakapalli Sub. Division, Visakhapatnam District, A.P. 4. The Station House Officer, Anakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, AP.

¶658

...Respondents

¶659

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the 3'^'* respondent in permitting the 4'^ respondent to open a rowdy sheet against the petitioner vide order in C.No. 18/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP-2014 dt.19-11-2014 as highly illegal, arbitrary

¶660

exercise of power, contrary to law and police manual and also violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents^4and 5 to discontinue the rowdy sheet.

¶661

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 19581 OF 2016^

¶662

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedintheaffidavit} filed in support of the petition, the High Court may^bepleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with petitioner life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet pending disposal of the above W.P. pending disposal^{oftheabovewritpetition.}

¶663

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶664

WRIT PETITION NO: 15870 OF 2016

¶665

Between:

¶666

Korukonda Kondala Rao, S/o Raju Naidu, aged about years^{Occ;cultivation,} R/o. Marniciipalem Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.

¶667

...Petitioner

¶668

AND

¶669

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶670

The Superintendent of Police Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District, A.P 3. The Addl. Superintendent of Police (Administration), HAC Anakapalli Sub. Division, Visakhapatnam District,A.P

¶671

The Station House Officer, Arakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalli, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

¶672

...Respondents

¶673

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the 3'’“ respondent in permitting the 4'” respondent to open a rowdy-sheet against the petitioner vide order in C.No.21/Rowdy-Sheet/SDPO-AKP-2014 dt.19-11-2014 as highly illegal, arbitrary exercise of power, contrary to law and police manual and also violative of Art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 to discontinue the rowdy sheet.

¶674

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19624 OF 20161

¶675

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct petition respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere with petition life and liberty under the guise of opening of a rowdy sheet against petition pending disposal of the above WP., pending disposal of the above WP.

¶676

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶677

WRIT PETITION NO: 17618 OF 2016

¶678

Between:

¶679

Alla Bala Krishna Murthy @ Bala Krishna, S/o. Sri Narayana Murthy, Hindu; Age 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.NO.70-14-313-A, Siddartha Nagar, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner

¶680

AND

¶681

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary, Home Department, aA.P. Secretariat at Hyderabad - 500 022.

¶682

The Superintendent of Police, Kakinada - 533 005,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 3. The Sub-Divisionai Police Officer, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District. 4. The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram PS, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District.

¶683

...Respondents

¶684

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in keeping the 'Rowdy Sheet' against the Petitioner on the file of the 4‘^ respondent even though no cases are pending against him as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under^{theConstitution} of India and for o a

¶685

consequential direction to the Respondents to drop all further proceedings including the withdrawal of 'Rowdy Sheet' against the Petitioner^forthwith. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 21645 OF 2016’) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station pursuant to the 'Rowdy Sheet' pending against him on the file of the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

¶686

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.SIVA REDDY

¶687

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶688

WRIT PETITION NO: 16809 OF 2022

¶689

Between:

¶690

Atiuri Punesh, S/o. Rambabu, Aged about 31 years, D.No. 1-6/1, Saibaba Temple Road, Nidamanuru, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District. ...Petitioner

¶691

AND

¶692

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Home Affairs, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District,

¶693

The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada City, Krishna^District.

¶694

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, East Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District. 5. The Station House Officer, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶695

The Station House Officer, Thotlavalluru Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶696

The Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶697

...Respondents

¶698

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Appropriate Writ, Order or Direction declaring the actions of the respondents herein in opening the rowdy sheet vide C.C. No.44/ACP.CD/2018 dated 25/03/2018 and continuing the Rowdy Sheet vide H.S.No. 3/2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, null and void, in violation to the very spirit and object of Police Standing Order No.601 and 742, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to close the Rowdy Sheet vide H.S.No. 3/2018 opened against the Petitioner.

¶699

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶700

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to call the petitioner to the police station at odd hours under the grab of surveillance and further direct the respondents not to resort to unwarranted actions such as cleaning the police station, bathrooms and the premises in and around the police station. lA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Rowdy Sheet vide H.S.No. 3/2018 against the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶701

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶702

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING COMMON ORDER:

¶703

CMR, J. W.P.No. 10997 of 2014 & Batch

¶704

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

¶705

Writ Petition Nos. 10997, 18746, 19757, 23203, 23262, 23762, 26117, 26233, 26397, 26717, 29463, 30029, 30072, 31045, 31301, 31322, 31451, 32146, 33603, 33900, 33974, 35006, 36644, 37133 of 2014; 1677, 3402, 5609, 6082, 6838, 7022, 7173, 12726, 13990, 14041, 14051, 14391, 16349, 17217, 17774, 20384, 21848, 23074, 25102, 27840, 28627, 29181, 31213, 31620, 36392, 34071 of 2015; 87, 2015, 3486, 6609, 15393, 15835, 15841, 15870, 17618 of 2016 and 16809 of 2022

¶706

COMMON ORDER:

¶707

In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners sought^either to quash the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets that are opened against them or to direct the respondent police officials to close the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/historysheets. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing^forthe respondents. 3. These Writ Petitions are being disposed of without going into the merits of the cases on the ground of legal validity^ofthe said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets opened by invoking the provisions of A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, in view of the recent common order of this High Court, dated 15.07.2022, in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch, whereby this Court held that the Standing Orders of A.P. Police^Manualor A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuatioⁿ of rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and keeping

¶708

„ CMR. J. W.P.No.10997 of 2014 & Batch

¶709

surveillance on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, i in terms of Chapter-37 of the aforesaid Standing Orders, are void.

¶710

The rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history -sheets were opened against the petitioners in all these Writ Petitions ini terms of Chapter-37 of the A.P. Police Standing Orders or A.P. Police Manual.

¶711

The legal validity of Chapter-37 of the said A.P. Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which the

¶712

said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets are being opened, has been questioned and challenged before this Court in W.P.No.3568 of 2022 and batch. This court, by its common order, dated 15.07.2022, passed in the above batch of Writ Petitions, after considering the law on the issue elaborately with reference to the earlier judgments rendered by the Apex Court

¶713

and. more particularly, with reference to the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court rendered in the case of K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of Indiai, held that Chapter-37 of the A.P Police Manual or A.P. Police Standing Orders on the basis of wh.ch the rowdy-sheets/suspect-shects/histoiy-sheets are being opened and surveillance is being kept on the individuals on the basis of the said rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, as void. At para.45 of the said common order, it is held as follows: 45) Hence, the Writ Petition No.3568 of 2022 is allowed declaring the Standing Orders of A.P. Police Manual / A.P. Police Standing Orders to the extent of opening/continuation (2017) 10 see 1

¶714

3 CMR, J. W.P.No. 10997 of 2014 & Batch

¶715

V. \

¶716

of Rowdy Sheet, Suspect Sheet, History Sheet etc., and on that basis the surveillance of the individual (in terms of Chapter 37 of the above said Standing Orders) as void. All the other Writ Petitions are also allowed. All the rowdy sheets opened in this batch of Writ Petitions are directed to be closed immediately. The police cannot open or continue a rowdy sheet or collect data pertaining to a person without the sanction of “law”. Collection of personal data and its usage for prevention of crimes also can only be in accordance with a “law” which crosses the thresholds mentioned in the Constitution of India and the various judgments including K.S.Puttaswamy case (2 supra) since ‘privacy’ is now a Fundamental Right as per PartIll of the Constitution of India. It is reiterated that the police cannot (under the existing orders) indulge in night visits; domiciliary visits to the houses of a suspect or accused. They cannot take or demand the photographs, fingerprints etc., except under the procedure established by a ‘law’ and if the conditions laid down are satisfied. Accused or suspects cannot be summoned or called to the Police Station or anywhere else either during festivals/elections/weekends etc. They cannot be made to wait at the Police Stations for any reason or seek permission to leave the local jurisdiction.”

¶717

Therefore, as the very Chapter-37 in the A.P. Police^Manual and A.P. Police Standing Orders, on the basis of which adl the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/histoiy-sheets are opened and surveillance is being kept on the petitioners on the basis of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the same are being continued, is now declared as void, the opening of the said the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners and continuing the same is clearly^{unsustainable} under law. They have no legal sanctity and they cannot be sustained under law and they cannot be allowed to be in force and continued any longer.

¶718

CMR. J. W.P.No. 10997 of 2014 & Batch

¶719

/

¶720

Therefore, in view of the aforesaid common order, dated 15.07.2022, of this Court and for the reasons stated therein, these Writ Petitions are allowed declaring the opening of the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets against the petitioners, which are all impugned in these Writ Petitions, as illegal and unconstitutional, Consequently, all the rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets. opened against the petitioners in these Writ Petitions, stand closed forthwith. The respondents in all these Writ Petitions are directed to close the the rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets in their records which are opened against the petitioners. No surveillance shall be kept on the petitioners herein on the basis of the said the rowdysheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets and the petitioners shall not be called to the Police Station in connection with any such rowdy-sheets/suspect-sheets/history-sheets, which are now declared as illegal and unconstitutional and which are closed. No costs.

¶721

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall also stand closed.

¶722

Sd/- P.VENKATA RAMANA JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE^^tTofficer

¶723

To

¶724

The Assistant Commissioner of Police (A.C.P.), Central Zone, Patamata Jurisdiction, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶725

M/s Sowmya Mishra, W/o Not known Deputy Superintendent^{ofPolice,Tenali,Guntur} District.

¶726

Mr. Rambabu, S/o Not known Sub Inspector of Police, Kollipora Police Station Kollipara Village and Mandal, Guntur District.

¶727

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.

¶728

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, East Division, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.

¶729

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, North, Sub-Division, Visakhapatnam.

¶730

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada.

¶731

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, West Zone, Vijayawada.

¶732

The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Narsipatnam, Visakhapatnam District.

¶733

The Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru, West Godavari^Dist.

¶734

The Circle Inspector of Police, Madanapalle, Rural^{PoliceStation,Madanapalle,Chittoor} District.

¶735

The Circle Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Circle, Mandapeta,^{EastGodavariDistrict.} 13. The Circle Inspector Of Police, Ravulapalem Circle,^{EastGodavariDistrict.}

¶736

The Circle Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur, Kurnool^District.

¶737

The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada City, Krishna^District.

¶738

The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam.

¶739

The Deputy Commissioner of Police(D.C.P.), Law^{&Order,PoliceCommissionerate,}

¶740

Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶741

1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), Gurajala^{Division,GunturDistrict,A.P} 19. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool District.

¶742

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Allagadda,^{KurnoolDistrict.}

¶743

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram, Anantapuram^District.

¶744

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakur Division,^{KurnoolDistrict.}

¶745

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Atmakuru,^{NelloreDistrict.}

¶746

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bapatia, Guntur^District.

¶747

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudur Division,^{SPSRNelloreDistrict.}

¶748

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Guntur West^Division, Guntur^District. 27. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nandigama,^Krishna District.

¶749

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narsapuram^{Sub-Division,} Narsapuram, West Godavari District.

¶750

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, North Sub-Division,^Mangalagiri, Guntur^District.

¶751

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Peddapuram,^{EastGodavariDistrict}

¶752

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry^{Rural,EastGodavariDistrict.}

¶753

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural Division,^{Guntur,GunturDistrict.}

¶754

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenali, Guntur^District.

¶755

The Director General of Police Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada.

¶756

The District Superintendent of Police, Kurnool^{District,Kurnool.}

¶757

The Divisional Superintendent of Police Eiuru, Eluru Sub, Sub Division, West Godavari District.

¶758

The Divisional Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR^{Nellore,Dist.}

¶759

The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem,^{WestGodavariDistrict.}

¶760

The Inspector of Police IV Town Police Station,^Kurnool.

¶761

The Inspector of Police, Bapatia Town Police Station,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶762

The Inspector of Police, CCRB, Visakhapatnam.

¶763

The Inspector of Police, III - Town Police Station, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.

¶764

The Inspector of Police, Krishnapatnam, SPSR Nellore^Dist.

¶765

The Inspector of Police, Palakollu Rural Circle, Pallakollu, West Godavari District.

¶766

The Inspector of Police, Tenali Rural, Guntur District.

¶767

The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat,

¶768

Amaravati, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶769

The Station House officer, Machavaram P.S., Machavaram Mandal, Gutnur District.

¶770

The Station House officer, Dornipadu Police Station,^{KurnoolDistrict.}

¶771

The Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, A.P Secretariat, now at Amaravati, Guntur District.

¶772

The Station House officer, Eluru II Town P.S., Eluru, West Godawari District.

¶773

The Station House officer, Eluru Rural Police Station, Eluru, West Godavari District. 52. The Station House Officer II Town Police Station Nandyal, Kurnool District 53. The Station House Officer Nandigama Police Station,^{KrishnaDistrict.} 54. The Station House Officer, Adoni II Town Police Station, Adoni, Kurnool District. 55. The Station House Officer, Allagadda Town Police Station, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 56. The Station House Officer, Arakapalli Rural Police Station Anakapalii, Visakhapatnam District, A.P.

¶774

The Station House Officer, Arundalpet Police, Station,^{GunturDistrict.} 58. The Station House Officer, Atmakur Police Station, Atmakur, Nellore District. 59. The Station House Officer, Avanigadda Police Station, Avanigadda, Krishna District 60. The Station House Officer, Durgi Police Station, Durgi, Guntur District, A.P-522 612 61. The Station House Officer, Elamanchili Police Station, Elamanchili, West Godavari District.

¶775

The Station House Officer, Guntakal Rural P.S Guntakal Mandal, Anantapur District. 63. The Station House Officer, I- Town Police Station Eluru, West Godavari District. 64. The Station House Officer, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada. 65. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station,^Kurnool. 66. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Vijayawada. 67. The Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapuramu District.

¶776

The Station House Officer, Jeelugumilli Police Station, West Godavari District.

¶777

The Station House officer, Kadiam Police Station, Kadiam, E.G.District. 70. The Station House Officer, Kolimigundla(M), Kurnool^District. 71. The Station House Officer, Kollipara Police Station,^GunturDist. 72. The Station House Officer, KOSIGI Police Station, Kosigi (V) (M) ,Kurnool District518313.

¶778

The Station House Officer, Kota Police Station, SPSR Nellore District.

¶779

The Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶780

The Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 76. The Station House officer, Manda peta I Town PS., Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 77. The Station House Officer, Mandapeta Town P.S., Mandapeta, East Godavari District. 78. The Station House Officer, Mangalagiri Town Police Station, Guntur District.

¶781

The Station House Officer, Manubolu Police Station, Manubolu, SPSR Nellore District.

¶782

The Station House Officer, Mudivedu Police Station, Mudivedu Chittoor District.

¶783

The Station House Officer, Nandavaram Police Station, Nandavaram, Kurnool District.

¶784

The Station House Officer, Old Guntur Police Station, Guntur Urban District.

¶785

The Station House Officer, Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶786

The Station House Officer, Peddakakani Police Station, Peddakakani, Guntur District.

¶787

The Station House Officer, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam.

¶788

The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram PS, Kakinada - 533 005, East Godavari District.

¶789

The Station House Officer, Savalyapuram Police Station, Guntur District. 88. The Station House Officer, Sirvel Police Station, Sirvel, Kurnool District. 89. The Station House Officer, T.P Gudur Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. 90. The Station House Officer, Tadikonda Police Station, Tadikonda, Guntur District 91. The Station House Officer, Tallapudi P.S, W.G.District,^{AndhraPradesh.}

¶790

The Station House Officer, Thondangi PS, East Godavari District.

¶791

The Station House Officer, Thotlavalluru Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶792

The Station House Officer, U.Kothapalli Police Station, East Godavari District.

¶793

The Station House Officer, V. Kota Police Station, V.Kota, Chittoor District.

¶794

The Station House Officer, Varadaiah Palem Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶795

The Station House Officer, Yeddanapudi Police Station, Prakasam District. 98. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Amalapuram Division, East Godavari District.

¶796

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Avanigadda,^{KrishnaDistrict}

¶797

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Eluru Sub Division,^AtEluru.

¶798

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.

¶799

The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Kowur, W.G.District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶800

The Sub- Divisional Police, Officer Machavaram Sub Division Guntur District.. 104. The Sub Inspector of Police, C K Dinne Police Station, YSR Kadapa District 105. The Sub Inspector of Police, Kothapeta Police Station, East Godavari District. 106. The Sub Inspector of Police, Mandapeta Rural Police Station Mandapeta, E.G.District. 107. The Sub Inspector of Police, Yellamanchili Town.

¶801

The Sub- Inspector of Police, Yemmiganur Rural Police Station, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District. 109. The Sub.Divisional Police Officer, Ramachandrapuram,^E.G.District

¶802

The Sub-Division Police Officer, Puttur, Chittoor^District.

¶803

The Sub-Division Police Officer, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District.

¶804

The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, (Deputy Superintendent of Police) Kakinada Sub-Division,

¶805

■/

¶806

113.	Kakinada, East Godavari District. TheSub-DivisionalPoliceOfficer,Adoni,Kurnool District.
114. 115.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gudur, SPSR ^Nellore District. TheSub-DivisionalPoliceOfficer,Kakinada -533005,EastGodavariDistrict.
116.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool ^District.
117.	TheSub-divisionalPoliceOfficer,Madanapalle, ^{Chittoor District.}
118.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal Kurnool District.
119. 120.	The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool ^District. TheSub-DivisionalPoliceOfficer,Narasaraopet,Guntur,GunturDistrict.
121.	The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nagarampalem P.S. ^Guntur.
122.	TheSub-InspectorofPolice,PatamataPoliceStation,Vijayawada,KrishnaDistrict.
123.	The Superintendent of Police Kurnool District, Kurnool.
124. 125.	The Superintendent of Police Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District, A.P TheSuperintendentofPoliceV/estGodavariDistrict, Eluru.
126.	The Superintendent of police, Anantapur, Anantapur ^District.
127.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,Chittoor,Chittoor ^District.
128.	The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari at Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh.
129.	TheSuperintendentofPolice,GunturDistrict ^{at Guntur.}
130.	The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, State of A.P., Machilipatnam, Krihna District
131. 132.	The Superintendent of Police, Nellore, SPSR Nellore ^Dist. TheSuperintendentofPolice,Ongole,Prakasam Dsitrict.
133. 134.	The Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District. TheSuperintendentofPolice,TirupatiUrbanPoliceDistrict,ChittoorDistrict.
135.	The Tahsildar Cum Mandal Executive Magistrate, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District.
136. 137. 138.	The The Superintendent of Police (Urban), Guntur, ^{Guntur District.} One CC to SMT.KAVITHA GOTTIPATI Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SMT.Y RATNA PRABHA Advocate [OPUC]
139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169.	One CC to SRI. A S C BOSE Advocate [OPUC] Orie CC to SRI. B PURUSHOJHAMA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] One One One CC to S One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to ’•^to SRI. B.SARVOTMAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC] CCft» SRI. BEXHJkVfeNKATESWARLU Advocate [OPUC] A VIJAYA BHASKER Advocate [OPUC] SRI. CHATRATI RADHA KRISHNA Advocate [OPUC] SRI. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. G L NAGESWAR RAO Advocate [OPUC] SRI. G SRAVAN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] SRI. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K B RAMANNA DORA Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K CHIDAMBARAM Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K L N SWAMY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K S MURTHY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K S SRINIVASA RAO Advocate [OPUC] SRI. K V R KRISHNA SHARMA Advocate [OPUC] SRI. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Advocate [OPUC] SRI. KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Advocate [OPUC] SRI. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Advocate [OPUC] SRI. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Advocate [OPUC] SRI. MD SALEEM Advocate [OPUC] SRI. MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM Advocate [OPUC] SRI. N ASWARTHA NAFtAYANA Advocate [OPUC] SRI. N SIVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. NARASIMHA RAO DAVULURI Advocate [OPUC] SRI. P HEMALA,LITHA KUMARI Advocate [OPUC] SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. P PRABHAKAR RAO Advocate [OPUC] SRI. P PRABHAKAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI.PSPSURESHKUMARAdvocate[OPUC]
170. 171. 172. 173.	One CC to One CC to One CC to OneCCto SRI. P SRIDHAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. RACHNA S WADDEPALLI Advocate [OPUC] SRI. RAJA REDDY KONETI Advocate [OPUC] SRI.RAMARAOMAVIDIAdvocate[OPUC]
174.	OneCCto
	SRI. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY Advocate [OPUC]
175.	One CC to SRI. S SRIDHAR Advocate [OPUC]
176. 177. 178. 179.	One CC to One CC to One CC to One CC to SRI. SIMHACHALAM BARAPAREDDY Advocate [OPUC] SRI. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Advocate [OPUC] SRI. SRINIVASULU KURRA Advocate [OPUC] SRI.SWARNASRINIVASBABUAdvocate[OPUC]
180.	One CC to SRI.SYEDKHADERMASTANAdvocate[OPUC]
181.	OneCCto SRI.TSNSUDHAKARAdvocate[OPUC]
182.	One CC to SRI.VNARAYANAREDDYAdvocate[OPUC] 1
183. 184. 185.	One CC to One CC to SRI. V PATTABHI Advocate [OPUC] SRI. V VINOD K REDDY Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SMT. A Gayatri Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
186.	OneCCtoSRI. KVVijayaKumar,Advocate[OPUC]

¶807

^ SRI. G VAASUDEVUDU Advocate [OPUC] 189' Two 1°'' Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] iio.’ Two CD CopreL°" of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] RAM

¶808

HIGH COURT

¶809

DATED:20/07/2022

¶810

TO
» 2 8 DEC m
Co.
^ ^ Current section ^

¶811

COMMON ORDER

¶812

WRIT PETITION Nos: 10997, 18746^ 19757, 23203, 23262, 23762. 2fi117^ 23233, 26397, 26717. 29463. 30029, 30072, 31045, 31301, 31322. 314»;1^ 32146, 33603, 33900, 33974. 35nnfi, M644, 37133 of 2014: 1677. 3402. 5609. ^82, 6838, 7022, 7173, 12726. 13990^ 14041, 14051, 14391, 16349, 17217. 17774, 20384, 21848, 23074, 25102. 27840, 28627, 29181, 31213, 31620. 36392, 34071 of 2015; 87. 2015, 3486. M09, 15393, 15835. 15841. 15«7n, 15835, 15841, 15870. 17618 of 2016 and 16809 of 2022

¶813

V

¶814

ALLOWING ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS

D. Nagaraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D. Nagaraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Angadi Ramalakshml, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Arigapudi Samrajyam Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Vadde Lakshmi Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

K. Ramalinga Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Meejuru Mallikarjuna Rao at Malli, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri Chowkala Brahmaiah at Naga Brahmaiah,Guntur,and Anr. Vs for the State of a.P.,Home,Hyd.,and 3 Otrs.