Disposed

Chelluri Venkata Maruthi Jagannadha Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC2 May 2022WP/6874/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition filed by MPHAs seeking consideration for appointment in accordance with a common order and a Government Memo. The court relied on the common order in W.P.No.4851 of 2022 which provided a four-week timeline for consideration.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the writ petition in terms of the operative common order in W.P.No.4851 of 2022 and closure of pending miscellaneous petitions.

Chelluri Venkata Maruthi Jagannadha… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.6874 OF 2022

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Services-IV for the respondents No.1 to 4.

¶5

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to the respondents to strictly adhere to the orders of the erstwhile High Court in W.P.No.38060 of 2013 dated 15.09.2015 and proceedings of the Government of Andhra Pradesh vide Memo No.7342/G2/2015-8 dated 24.05.2016 for consideration of the petitioners appointment as Multy Purpose Health Assistants (Male) (hereinafter referred to as “MPHAs (Male)”.

¶6

Both the counsels at the bar submit that this matter is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in W.P.No.4851 of 2022 and batch dated 08.03.2022. The operative portion of the said common order is as follows:

¶7

“i) The respondents shall consider cases of the Writ Petitioners for appointment as MPHAs within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, in terms of Memo No.7342/G2/2015-8, dated 24.05.2016 based on their merit, if any candidate less meritorious than the Writ Petitioners are appointed;

¶8

¶9

ii) If any of the Writ Petitioners have not submitted the relevant certificates/documents they should be called upon to submit the same by granting reasonable time of not less than four (04) weeks;

¶10

iii) In the event of any genuine objection for considering the case of any of the Writ Petitioners, they shall be notified the same by issuing appropriate notice/communication and afforded an opportunity before taking further action in the matter.”

¶11

In terms of the same, this Writ Petition is also disposed of. The registry is directed to append the copy of that order along with this order copy. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this case, shall stand closed.

¶13

_________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN

¶14

Dt.02-05-2022 Yvk

Chelluri Venkata Maruthi Jagannadha Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chelluri Venkata Maruthi Jagannadha Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P Srinivas Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K.Sambi Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Gedela Satyanarayana Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Kakarla Krishnaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Marturi Sailaja Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

L.Ranga Reddy, Vs State of A.P.