This is a one-line order closing a writ petition where the respondent asserted that no effort had been made to dispossess the petitioner, rendering the prayer inappropriate.
The writ petition was closed; liberty granted to invoke remedies if any cause of action arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.507 OF 2021
P.Santhosham … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District and Others ..… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.B.Sriram Kartik Counsel for the respondents : G.P. for Revenue
ORDER :
The matter is posted under Specially Identified Cases.
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-
“……to issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in making efforts to dispossess the petitioner from his house site admeasuring Ac.0.01 ½ cents in Plot No.14 in Survey No.90/1B of Chinapulleru Village, Undi Mandal, West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of subject matter house site and to pass such other order or orders….”
2. At the time of considering the matter, the learned
Government Pleader for Revenue, draws the attention of this Court
2
to Para No.14 of the counter-affidavit, wherein it is asserted as
follows:
“14. In reply to the contents of the petitioner’s affidavit in Para 9, it is submitted that the prayer of the petitioner to the Hon’ble High Court to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his house site measuring an extent of Ac.0.01 ½ cents in Plot No.14 in R.S.No.90/1B of Chinapulleru Village of Undi Mandal, West Godavari District deserves no consideration as the respondents have never tried to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the house site of the petitioner measuring an extent of Ac.0.01 ½ cents in Plot No.14 in R.S.No.90/1B of Chinapulleru Village of Undi Mandal of West Godavari District….”
Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
Date: 16.11.2022 BLV
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.507 OF 2021
Dt: 16.11.2022
BLV
P. Santhosham
The State of Andhra Pradesh
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
