Duppada Ramu Naidu, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Held the writ petition challenging the threat to dispossess the petitioner from land based on a wrong revenue entry is premature. The court noted the authority had 30 days to process the petitioner's pending application and ordered dismissal with an expectation of prompt action.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed with expectation that the authority will attend to petitioner's application within stipulated 30-day time limit.