Disposed

Ayacut Dar Committee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Jul 2022WP/18980/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed for non-payment of a final bill regarding a public works contract. The court directed the respondents to complete verification within three weeks and pay dues within six weeks. Failure to complete verification would oblige immediate payment.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete verification within 3 weeks and pay dues within 6 weeks; payment mandatory if verification exceeds 3 weeks.

Ayacut Dar Committee Vs The State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.18980 of 2022

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

The petitioner had been awarded the contract for taking up the “Neeru-Chettu” programme for repairs and strengthening the ayacut road from Chenchu Nagi Reddy fields to C. Venkata Ramudu fields near Erraguduru Village of KC Canal, vide Agreement No.758/2018-19 dated 02.05.2018. After execution of the said work, a final bill for Rs.7,70,773/- had been prepared and submitted to the concerned for payment. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner had approached this Court, by way of this writ petition.

¶5

It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of the aforesaid sums of money, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money is clearly arbitrary and high-handed requiring the interference of this Court.

¶6

This Court, in various orders, including the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch had taken the view that such non-payment of dues is arbitrary and that such dues need to be cleared by the respondents at the earliest.

¶7

The learned Government Pleader submits that the respondent authorities are verifying the claims of the petitioner

¶8

¶9

RRR,J W.P.No. 18980 of 2022

¶10

and would be in a position to make payment only after such verification is completed.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid directions of this Court in various cases and after hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Irrigation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the verification process within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter to pay the amount due to the petitioner depending upon the outcome of the verification, within a period of six weeks. It is clarified that in the event of the verification process not being completed within the aforesaid period of three weeks, the respondents shall pay the amount due to the petitioner, without insisting upon any further time for verification. It would also be open to the petitioner to agitate his/her/their claim for interest, if any payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶13

____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.

¶14

05.07.2022 MJA

¶15

¶16

RRR,J W.P.No. 18980 of 2022

¶17

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶18

WRIT PETITION No.18980 of 2022

¶19

05.07.2022

¶20

MJA

Ayacut Dar Committee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayacut Dar Committee v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T Raghuramulu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Meka Venkata Sita Devi Vs The Government of Ap

Sareddy Narasimha Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Arasu Venkata Ramana Reddy, Vs Sri S.S. Rawat, I.A.S

G Sunitha Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

A Shankar Reddy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh