In this contempt case, the petitioner sought punishment for wilful disobedience of a previous order. The court noted non-compliance regarding bill uploads and issued a Form-I notice requiring Respondent No 4 in person.
Issued Form-I notice to Respondent No 4 requiring personal attendance by 05.07.2023, unless bills were uploaded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
? ` I
FORM-I
NOTICE FOR APPEARANCE IN PERSON AFTER ADMIS
(SEE RULE 18)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR/
(Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ll^/ENTIETH DAY OF APRIL, ll^/O THOUSAND AND ll^/ENTY THREE f~
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO p~ CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4083 OF 2022 ,
Between:
Arasu Venkata Ramana Reddy, S/o. Srinivasula Reddy, aged 54 years, R/o. H.No.3-45, Gadigarevula Village, Gadivemula Mandal, Kurnool District. ,
...petitiohe+~
AND
WHEREAS the Petitioner has presented under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, above case through his counsel M/s Ramesh Babri Talluri, praying the High Court to punish the Respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.14797 of 2022 dated 17.07.2022; .,
WHEREAS the said case coming on for hearing on this day and whereas the High Court upon perusing the affidavit filed herel'n and the order of\ High Court dated 23.12.2022 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of M/s Ramesh Babu TaIIuri, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri V.Ashok Ram, Advocate for Respondent No.1 and of Smt. S.Siva Kumari, Advocate for Respondent No.2, Court made the following ,
ORDER:
lilt is represented that the bills of the petitioner have not yet been uploaded. There is no compliance despite time being granted.
Accordingly, issue Form-I to the 4th respondent.
However, the presence of the respondent shall stand dispensed with',if the bills are uploaded by that day. I
Post on 05.07-2023..,2,
To.
Srj V. Srinivasa Reddy, Executive Engineer, WRD, Minor lrrl'gatl'on Dl'vision, Nandyal, KurnooI District. ~
WHEREAS your attendance is necessary to answer the charge under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act vl'z; for their wl'Ilful disobedience of the 1; orders of thl's Hon'ble Court passed in wp No.14797 of 2022 dated 17.07.2022.r
I . Therefore, you, viz ;
are hereby required to appear in person before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Nelapadu) on o5.07.2023 at 10.30 A.M and show cause as to why you shall not be punished or other appropriate order be not passed against you for contempt of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. ,
You shall attend the High Coutt of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati at Nelapadu, in Person On 05.O712O23 at 10.30 A.M and shall continue to attend the High Court on all days thereafter to whl'ch date the case against you stands adjourned, and until fl'nal orders are passed on the charge against you.
Hereln fall not D¥P`Uftrfu t/le ng i
Tol
PSD
HIGH COURT
RRR,J
DATED :20/04/2023
NOTE: POST ON 05.07.2023
ORDER
CC.No.4083 of 2022
i
.`>m'n{_
{
iE
NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner was entitled to Form-I notice for punishment under Contempt of Courts Act.
Whether Respondent No 4 complied with billing court requirements.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Arasu Venkata Ramana Reddy
Sri V. Srinivasa Reddy
R Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
