In a writ petition concerning encroachment on a Panchayat road, the court directed the Grampanchayat to consider the petitioner's representations and pass a speaking order after hearing parties shortly.
Direction to the 5th respondent to consider representations and pass a speaking order within three weeks after hearing parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.14164 of 2022
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayatraj and Rural Development for respondent Nos. 2 and 5 and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4.
2
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
Dt.15.07.2022 PGT
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.14164 of 2022
Dated:15.07.2022
PGT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a directive to consider representations regarding road encroachments.
Petitioner
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
Respondent No. 5 (Grampanchayat)
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
