The single-judge bench held that a temporary Fair Price Shop Dealer has no right to claim permanent appointment during vacancies. No notice is needed to temporary dealers. Writ petition challenging the notification filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
The Writ Petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI WRIT PETITION No.12414 of 2018
ORDER :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader.
one Smt. Polisetty Mamatha, W/o Balaji, was appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealer to the subject shop vide proceedings, dated 21.03.2018.
_________________________________ KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J
Date: 18.02.2022 Ks
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
WRIT PETITION No.12414 of 2018
Date: 18.02.2022
Ks
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a temporary Fair Price Shop Dealer has a right to claim permanent appointment before a vacancy is filled up.
Whether notice is required to be given to a temporary dealer when a permanent dealership is sought to be filled.
Whether the Notification calling for permanent dealership is illegal and arbitrary regarding the petitioner.
Petitioner (Smt. temporary Fair Price Shop Dealer)
Government Pleader/2nd Respondent
Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
