The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a civil revision petition filed by the petitioner against an order of the Additional District Judge, finding the petition infructuous as the original civil suit had already been decreed with costs.
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; all pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.626 OF 2019
(Through physical mode)
K.G.Bharathi, W/o Y.Vijaya Krishna, Hindu, aged about 44 years, R/o D.No.14-28, L.B.Nagar, M.R.Palle Panchayat, Tirupati, Chittoor District
..Petitioner
Versus Nagireddy Raja Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o Flat No.413, 4th Floor, Aditya Towers, Balaji Colony, Tirupati …Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.Raghavan K Thalapaka Counsel for the respondent : -
ORAL ORDER
Dt:23.09.2022
This Civil Revision Petition is arising out of the order dated 20.09.2018 passed in E.A.No.12 of 2018 in E.P.No.1 of 2016 in O.S.No.93 of 2011 by the learned X Additional District Judge, Tirupati.
2
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ
Ksp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition is infructuous due to decreeing of the original suit.
K.G.Bharathi
Nagireddy Raja Reddy
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
