Allowed

Afa Industrial Security Services v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Andhra Pradesh HC16 Sept 2022ARBAPPL/20/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order disposed of an application seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court appointed a retired district judge as the sole arbitrator upon the parties' consent.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. D. Tarakaram, Retired District Judge, as sole arbitrator. Arbitration application disposed of.

Afa Industrial Security Services Vs Hindustan Petroleum… — Arbitration | Andhra Pradesh HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI

¶2

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶3

ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.20 of 2022

¶4

(Through physical mode)

¶5

AFA Industrial Security Services, Rep., by its Proprietor Sri Major (retd.) P.V. Rao, Flat No.103-B, First Floor, Vishnu Surya Prabha Paradise, KGH Up Road, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam.

¶6

..Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, a Government of India Company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, rep., by its Chairman & Managing Director, Registered office at : 17, Jamshedji Tata Road, Petroleum House, Mumbai-400 020, and others.

¶9

…Respondents

¶10

Counsel for the applicant : Mr. K.A. Narasimham.

¶11

Counsel for the respondents : Mr. Sreekanth Reddy Ambati

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

Dt:16.09.2022

¶14

This application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and

¶15

Conciliation Act, 1996 has been preferred for appointment of sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes arising between the parties in relation to the contract dated 01.02.2018.

¶16

¶17

Learned counsel for the respondents has expressed no objection

¶18

for appointment of arbitrator to conduct arbitration at Visakhapatnam.

¶19

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, Mr. D. Tarakaram, Retired District Judge, is appointed as sole arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the parties. The parties are at liberty to file their respective pleadings before the arbitrator.

¶20

The fee of the arbitrator, place of arbitration and the other terms and conditions shall be settled by the arbitrator so appointed in consultation with the parties.

¶21

Registry will send a copy of this order to Mr. D. Tarakaram, Retired District Judge, D.No.55-26/F, H.B. Colony, Behind Sivalayam/Gayathri Peetam, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam-530 022. (Mobile No.8985243555).

¶22

Accordingly, the Arbitration Application is disposed of. No costs. All pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

¶23

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CJ

¶24

¶25

¶26

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶27

A.A. No.20 of 2022

¶28

Dt:16.09.2022

¶29

Afa Industrial Security Services v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Afa Industrial Security Services v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tanniru Sita Maha Lakshmi Vs Soma Rama Krishna

Chintalapudi Srinivasa Rao Vs Chintalapudi Venkata Sulochana

G Ravindra Vs S Sreeramulu

Kuna satya Rao Vs Balivada Govinda Rao

M/s. M.S.P. Granites, Vs v G Venkata Reddy

V Brahmam Vs Y Suresh