Single judge order allowing Crl.P.No.9204 of 2022 to quash Crime No.305 of 2016 arising from a dispute between competing cable television network service providers where a compromise was reached between parties.
Criminal Petition allowed; Crime No. 305 of 2016 quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9204 of 2022
ORDER:
The petitioners and the 2nd respondent/defacto-
complainant in Crl.P.No.9204 of 2022 are personally present.
The petitioner No.3 and respondent No.2 are represented by their respective authorised persons mentioned in the cause title. They are identified by their counsel.
2
3
withdrawing the complaints made by them by ensuring effective closure of the said complaints by moving this Court for quashing the said complaints.
9. Accordingly, Criminal Petition is allowed.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
24.11.2022 MJA
4
49
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9204 of 2022
24.11.2022
MJA
Petitioners
2nd respondent/defacto-complainant
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
