Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an F.I.R. was allowed as the matter was covered by an earlier common order of the Court quashing similar F.I.Rs for identical facts. Consequently, F.I.R. is quashed.
F.I.R. No.148 of 2019 registered against petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3 is quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATHI HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CRIMINAL PETITION No.4755 of 2022
Pamu Seshandra Kumar and another ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor. …. Respondent
Counsel for the petitioners : Sri P.Madhu Sudhan Counsel for the respondent : Assistant Public Prosecutor
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State.
2
for quash of the F.I.R., registered against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor fairly submits that the matter can be disposed of in the light of the above mentioned decision.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date: 06.07.2022 BLV
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.4755 of 2022
Dt: 06.07.2022
BLV
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present criminal petition should be quashed in light of a similar common order passed by this Court.
Whether the authorities were required to reconsider the decision against the petitioners.
Pamu Seshandra Kumar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
