Single bench order disposing of a contempt petition where the petitioner alleged non-compliance with a prior order. The court accepted the submission that the order was complied with. The contempt case was closed without adjudication or imposition of costs.
Contempt case closed; no costs; all pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.1536 OF 2022
A.Anupallavi Bhuvaneswari … Petitioner
Versus
S.Suresh Kumar and others. … Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.Ravi Kondaveeti
Counsel for the respondents : Government Pleader for Education ORDER :
Mr.V.Madhu Sudhanarao, learned counsel, representing Mr.Ravi Kondaveeti, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order alleging non-compliance of which the present Contempt Case has been filed, is complied with and no adjudication is required in the matter.
In view of the submission made, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Date: 04.07.2022 BLV
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.1536 of 2022
Date: 04-07-2022
BLV
A.Anupallavi Bhuvaneswari
S.Suresh Kumar
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
