Meda Venkata Kumara Swamy v. The Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case alleging violation of a reinstatement order, the petitioner absconded. The court noted pending CBI cases prevented reinstatement and held no case of contempt was made out, closing the proceeding.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case dismissed; no costs; all pending miscellaneous applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE
CONTEMPT CASE No.1032 of 2009
(Through physical mode)
Meda Venkata Kumara Swamy S/o. M. Sreeramulu, aged about 46 years, Adinarayanapuram, Epurupalem post, Chirala Mandal, Prakasam District-523166.
..Petitioner
Versus
Sri Avani Vaish, I.A.S., Managing Director, Tribal Co-operative Marketing Development Federation of India Ltd. (TRIFED), Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Govt. of India, NCUI Building, II Floor, 3, Siri Institutional Area, August Kranthi Marg, Hauz Khas, New Delhi.
New Delhi. …Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. P.V. Krishnaiah Counsel for the respondent : Mr. T. Venkat Raju Goud Ms. E. Urmila
ORAL ORDER
Dt:10.03.2022
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the allegations of violation of a prior reinstatement order constitute contempt given pending CBI trial.
Whether a case of contempt is made out against the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meda Venkata Kumara Swamy
- respondent
Sri Avani Vaish
Coram
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/1032/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court