The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the application of the appellant's counsel, with no order as to costs and pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
A.S.No.31 of 2020
JUDGMENT:
Sri B. V. Rama Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri D.G. Naidu, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal. A letter to that effect has also been filed on 18.04.2022.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
19.04.2022 BSM
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
A.S.No.31 of 2020
19.04.2022
BSM
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
