Review application allowed to amend a previous order directing refund of distillery expansion fees to include payment of 9% interest per annum.
Order dated 18.04.2022 in W.P.No.3574 of 2019 amended to direct respondents to pay 9% interest per annum on refundable fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Review.I.A.No.1 of 2022 In W.P.No.3574 of 2019
ORDER:
The above writ petition had been filed by the petitioner for refund of fees paid to the respondents in relation to his application for expansion of distillery of the petitioner.
RRR,J 2 Rev.I.A.No.1 of 2022 In W.P.No.3574 of 2019
therein were granted interest at the rate of 9% per annum on the fees that was to be refunded to them.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
10th August, 2022 Js.
RRR,J 3 Rev.I.A.No.1 of 2022 In W.P.No.3574 of 2019
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Review.I.A.No.1 of 2022
In
W.P.No.3574 of 2019
10th August, 2022
Js.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review application to include direction for payment of 9% interest on refundable fees is an error apparent on the face of the record warranting correction.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Appeals No. 1630 and 1638 of 2018Referred¶5
W.A.Nos.1630 and 1638 of 2018
Petitioner
Respondents
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
