Smt. Samanthakurthi Ramalaxmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No substantive legal proposition discussed in this order.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No substantive legal proposition discussed in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION No.604 OF 2018
ORDER :
When this matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Srinivas Basava submitted that the cause in this petition does not survive any further for adjudication and became infructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
_______________________________________ JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 03.02.2021
IS
7
2
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.604 OF 2018
Date: 03.02.2021
IS
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court