Single-judge Writ Court dismissed multiple writ petitions filed by a hawker challenging the allotment of a prepaid taxi counter. The Court held the petitioner's locus was suspect and noted that no lis survived as the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam had already initiated eviction proceedings against the allottee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.7596 of 2021, 12049 of 2019, 23768 of 2015, 24133 of 2018 & 8647 of 2014
COMMON ORDER:
The same writ petitioner has filed all the writ
petitions.
2
Roc.No.Rev2/90/AEO(P& R)/Tml/2012, dated 29.06.2020. This order of cancellation was challenged by Smt. A.Shanthamma, by way of W.P.No.11995 of 2020, before this Court, and the same was allowed and the order of cancellation was set aside. Subsequently, the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam, has again initiated proceedings, for eviction of Smt.A. Shanthamma.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
04.09.2021 BSM
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.7596 of 2021, 12049 of 2019, 23768 of 2015, 24133 of 2018 & 8647 of 2014
04-09-2021
BSM
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed by a hawker on a speculative basis to cancel allotment of prepaid taxi counter ports a viable cause of action.
Whether a writ petition survives when the concerned authority has already initiated separate eviction proceedings against the interested party.
Sri. P.R.K. Amarendra Kumar
Smt. A. Shanthamma
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
