S Kumari v. the Station House Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner instructed counsel not to press the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
The petitioner instructed counsel not to press the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No. 19165 of 2021
(Taken up through video conferencing)
S.Kumari W/o. Srinivasulu Reddy Aged about 27 yrs, Occ: Household, r/o. Peddabayilu village, Vedurukuppam Mandal, Chittoor District. .. Petitioner
Versus
The Station House Officer, Thottambedu Police Station, Chittoor District and others. .. Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. P.Nagendra Reddy
Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Mr. Y.N.Vivekananda, Government Pleader
ORAL ORDER
Dt: 03.09.2021
(per Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ)
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CJ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
GM
2
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No. 19165 of 2021 (per Arup Kumar Goswami, CJ)
Dt: 03.09.2021
GM
S. Kumari
The Station House Officer, Thottambedu Police Station
Arup Kumar Goswami
Ninala Jayasyura
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court