The respondent failed to show on hearing dates and failed to file a representation on the date of dismissal. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
Writ Petition No. 17196 of 2010 dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 17196 of 2010
ORDER:
There was no representation for the petitioner on 16.11.2021, 23.11.2021 and 30.11.2021. There is no representation for the petitioner even today when the matter is posted for dismissal.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Date : 06.12.2021
SPP
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.17196 of 2010
Date : 06.12.2021
SPP
Petitioner
Union of India
R. Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
