The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by counsel, noting the dispute had settled out of court. No order as to costs was passed.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.10063 of 2011
ORDER:
Sri M.Anusha, learned counsel appearing for Sri Ch. Dhanamjaya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute in the writ petition has settled out of court and seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
08.09.2021
BSM
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.10063 of 2011
08.09.2021
BSM
Ch. Dhanamjaya
R. Raghunandan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
