The Ap State Road Transport Corporation v. Jayanthi Satyanarayana Murthy and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE…
SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
M.A.C.M.A.No.2117 of 2011
JUDGMENT : (per UDPR,J)
When the matter was called on 27.01.2021, there was no representation for the appellant, as such, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant has no interest in prosecuting the M.A.C.M.A.
3. Hence, the M.A.C.M.A is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending for
consideration, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
J.UMA DEVI, J
04.02.2021 SS
U. Durga Prasad Rao
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court