Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; appellant consistently absent despite multiple listings, indicating lack of inclination to proceed.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
M.A.C.M.A. No.1837 OF 2006
JUDGMENT:
The proceeding sheet discloses that on 01.03.2021, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, therefore the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. On 15.03.2021, when the matter came up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. However, to provide one more reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant, the matter was again directed to be listed on 18.03.2021 under the same caption. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is also no representation on behalf of the appellant. The conduct of the appellant in remaining absent on the dates fixed for hearing or not getting the matter represented by its counsel on any of the dates mentioned above shows that the appellant does not have any inclination to proceed with the case.
Under these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Date.18.03.2021 Gk
2
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
M.A.C.M.A. No.1837 OF 2006
18.03.2021
Gk
Appellant
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
