S Shameer v. K R M K Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Justice C. Praveen Kumar closed Contempt Case No. 79 of 2020, finding no willful violation of the previous order regarding sports quota selection for the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to avail remedy under law if any.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
Contempt Case No. 79 of 2020
ORDER :
- The present Contempt case came to be filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, for willful and deliberate violation of the Order, dated 16.10.2019, passed in W.P. No. 8526 of 2019, wherein, this Court passed the following order:
“7. Hence, recording the said statement, liberty is given to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents, within a period of 10 days and on such representation made by the petitioner, the respondents shall pass appropriate orders within three (3) weeks thereon, keeping in view the above position of the Rules and Law and shall select the petitioner against the sports quota, if he is otherwise qualified”
- In terms of the Order in the Writ Petition, the Petitioner made a representation, dated 23.10.2019. The Respondents Authority considered the representation and passed an Order on 05.12.2019. While passing the said Order, the Authority referred to G.O. Ms. No. 74, dated 09.08.2012, issued by the Youth Advancement, Tourism & Culture (Sports) Department. Thereafter, another G.O.Ms. No. 7, dated 07.03.2019, came to be issued adding “Ball Badminton”.
- Taking into consideration the ground position and the G.Os. issued by the Government from time-to-time, more particularly, G.O.Ms. No. 7, dated 07.03.2019, the request of the applicant
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents Authority
Coram
C. Praveen Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Andhra Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/79/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court