Oral order granting liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition after withdrawing the current writ petition following receipt of requested documents.
Liberty to file a fresh petition; closure of pending miscellaneous applications; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CHIEF JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI & JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY
WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.166 of 2020
Satti Bhagvan Reddy S/o. Satti Nagi Reddy, a/a.62 yrs, R/o.9-65, Boda Vari Veedhi, Pedapudi Mandalam, G.Mamidada, East Godavri, A.P.-533 344. .. Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati and 7 others. ..Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana Counsel for the Respondents : G.P. for Land Acquisition
ORAL ORDER
(Through video conference)
Dt: 09.09.2020
per J.K. Maheshwari, CJ
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that prior to filing of the Writ Petition in respect of the records of land acquisition proceedings, some documents, which are not the part of this Writ Petition, were called for by the petitioner. Now, the relevant documents have been supplied. Therefore, he wishes to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition, making
2
note of all the relevant pleadings to that effect. Counsel for respondents expressed his ‘no objection’.
J.K. MAHESHWARI, CJ K.SURESH REDDY,J
GM
Satti Bhagvan Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
J.K. Maheshwari
K. Suresh Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
