The High Court allowed an application for permission to withdraw the main writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn, closing pending interlocutory applications.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was allowed; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
I.A.No.02 OF 2020
IN/AND
WRIT PETITION No.6270 OF 2020
ORDER : ( per UDPR,J)
Learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Nagaraju Naguru, filed I.A.No.02 of 2020 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the main writ petition.
Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of I.A.No.02 of 2020, the same is allowed and permission for withdrawal is accorded.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending for consideration, shall stand closed.
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
11.09.2020 SS
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
