The State of Ap v. K G Madhav
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the afflux of time without issuing any substantive order or relief.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the afflux of time without issuing any substantive order or relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
Writ Petition No.3966 of 2019
(Proceedings taken up through video conferencing)
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Rakesh Kumar)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on the instructions of the learned Advocate General, in the presence of Sri K.Ramamohan , learned counsel for the respondent, submits that by afflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as the same has become
infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
______________ Rakesh Kumar, J
____________ J. Uma Devi, J
Dt.06.10.2020 RAR
Petitioners
Respondent
Rakesh Kumar
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court