Disposed
Garikini Simhadri, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh HCWP/18295/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court held service of notice could not be accepted due to lack of evidence of attempted service. The petitioners were directed to submit an explanation. The 5th respondent was directed to consider the explanation, afford a hearing, and dispose of the matter within eight weeks. Coercive dispossession is stayed pending compliance.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners directed to submit explanation; Respondent to afford hearing and order within 8 weeks; dispossession stayed pending compliance; interlocutory applications closed.