Single judge order dismissing the civil revision petition as infructuous upon concession by both parties that the cause does not survive for adjudication; miscellaneous applications closed.
The civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 4506 OF 2014
ORDER:
When the matter came up for hearing, Ms.V.Bindu, Advocate, representing Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the revision petitioners submits that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Learned counsel for the respondents did not oppose the said submission.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________ JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
16.12.2020 Mjl /*
Nandigam Krishna Rao
Respondents
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
