CIVIL revision petition dismissed under Summary Rule. Petitioner did not appear despite multiple listings for dismissal. Court closed miscellaneous petitions pending.
Petitioner absent; matter dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2076 OF 2014
ORDER:
As can be seen from the proceedings sheet, this Civil Revision Petition came up for hearing on 01.09.2020 and on that day, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 17.09.2020 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’. Even the matter was listed under the caption ‘for Dismissal’ on 16.12.2020, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter is directed to be posted to 17.12.2020 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
Despite the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________ JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
17.12.2020 Mjl /*
Petitioner
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
