Disposed¶14

Jogindra Singh Pal and 7 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Mar 2026WRIC/9281/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court WRIT-C 9281 of 2026, Jogindra Singh Pal v. State of U.P., decided 19.03.2026; Scheduled Caste Certificate English version; Tehsildar Tehsil Khatauli District Muzaffar Nagar; representation dated 27.12.2025; direction to decide representation in accordance with law within one month; disposed without merits; Rajesh Kumar for petitioners; C.S.C. for State.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to each petitioner to file a detailed separate representation with certified copy of the order before respondent No.2-Tehsildar within one month; respondent No.2 directed to consider and decide such representation in accordance with law within one month of receipt, without adjudication on merits. ¶14

Jogindra Singh Pal and 7 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 9281 of 2026

¶3

Jogindra Singh Pal And 7 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Rajesh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 40

¶10

HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶12

The present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction upon the respondent No.2-Tehsildar, Tehsil Khatauli, District Muzaffar Nagar to take a decision on the representation dated 27.12.2025 stated to have been filed for issuance of English version of the Scheduled Caste Certificates, said to be already issued in favour of the petitioners. The caste certificates issued earlier in favour of the petitioners have been annexed as Annexure no.2 to the writ petition.

¶13

Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioners.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, we dispose off the writ petition permitting each petitioners to file detailed separate representation alongwith certified copy of this order before the respondent No.2-Tehsildar, Tehsil Khatauli, District Muzaffar Nagar within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioners, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioners.

¶15

March 19, 2026 Sattyarth

¶16

(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jogindra Singh Pal and 7 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jogindra Singh Pal and 7 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ramji Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Hemshankar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anurag Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Krishna Rawat vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rajesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sadashiv Mani Tripathi vs State of U.P. and 2 Others