Dismissed¶17

Kamal Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Allahabad HC18 Mar 2026WRIC/8042/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ - C No. 8042 of 2026, Allahabad High Court, decided March 19, 2026, coram Atul Sreedharan and Siddharth Nandan, JJ. Petition dismissed as not maintainable: relief claimed against private respondent (preliminary objection of Standing Counsel upheld). Sought certiorari against order dated 21.04.2025 of respondent No.3 rejecting representation dated 05.08.202; sought mandamus to S.D.M., Koil for police eviction of respondents 4-8 from plot rakba 28.88 sq gaz (24.15 sq meter), abadi Alhadadpur, Tehsil-Koil, Aligarh, purchased by petitioner's wife by registered sale deed. Liberty to pursue alternative remedy. No statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief granted; petitioner left open to pursue such other alternative remedy as available to him under the law. ¶17

Kamal Singh Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 8042 of 2026

Kamal Singh

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 7 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Shyam Sunder
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 2

¶10

HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

¶11

List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶12

Learned Standing Counsel has made a preliminary objection that the relief claimed in this petition is against the private respondent and accordingly, the present writ petition is not maintainable.

¶13

We have also perused the prayer made in this petition. For ready reference, the same is quoted below:

¶14

a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing impugned order dated 21.04.2025 passed by the respondent No.3 whereby rejected the representation of the petitioner dated 05.08.202 (Annexure No.5).

¶15

b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the S.D.M., Koil to issue order to the police of concerned police station to evict the respondent No.4 to 8 from the plot rakba 28.88 sq gaz (24.15 sq meter) situated in the abadi, Alhadadpur, Pargana & Tehsil-Koil, Aligarh purchased by the wife of the petitioner by way registered sale deed.

¶16

We find the preliminary objection raised by learned Standing Counsel is sustainable and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.

¶17

However, it shall be open to the petitioner to pursue such other alternative remedy as available to him under the law.

¶18

(Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.) March 19, 2026 piyush

¶19

Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kamal Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamal Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Union of India and Others Vs P. K. Agrawal and Others

Durga Prasad Asthana Vs State of U.P. and Others

Union of India Railway and Others Vs Bharat Singh and Another

Munsilal and 13 Others Vs Union of India and 2 Others

Rakesh Verma Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Panna Lal Vs State of U.P. and 9 Others