Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; non-prosecution; no appearance by petitioner's counsel; interim order vacated; Rani Devi v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Writ - C No. 5399 of 2018; Sudhanshu Chauhan, J.; order dated April 24, 2026; no merits adjudication, no ratio laid down.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 5399 of 2018
Rani Devi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
| .....Respondent(s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : V.K.S. S |
omvanshi | ||
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Kamlesh Pandey |
Dharmen Kumar |
dra Trip |
Kumar Yadav, athi, Mohan Lal |
Court No. - 4
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
April 24, 2026 Gaurav
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
How this case reached the court
When the list was revised, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.¶11
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
