Ahmad Abdulla vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and 2 Others

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

LUCKNOW

¶3

WRIT - C No. - 4236 of 2026

Ahmad Abdulla

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of External Affairs New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bahar Ali, Dharmendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 3

¶9

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.

¶10

1. Heard Shri Bahar Ali, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate & DSGI assisted by Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondent(s) and perused the materials available on record.

¶11

2. This writ petition has been filed for the following main relief(s):

¶12

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties to issue passport in favour of petitioner in pursuance of his application dated 30.01.2025 bearing Application No. LK3060667496425."

¶13

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter may be disposed of in light of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Pawan Kumar Rajbhar versus Union of India and 2 others; Writ-C No.41540 of 2023 : Neutral Citation No.2024:AHC:9963-DB.

¶14

4. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is controverted by Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing on behalf of the respondent(s). His submission is that the judgment of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra) has been

¶15

WRIC No. 4236 of 2026

¶16

2

¶17

modified by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Verma vs. Union of India and others; Petition(s) Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.7481 of 2024 vide judgment and order dated 20.09.2024.

¶18

5. It may be noted that in Smt. Rita Verma vs. Union of India and others; Writ-C No.6450 of 2024; Neutral Citation No.2024:AHC:35201-DB, the Division Bench of this Court had reiterated the ratio of Pawan Kumar Rajbhar (supra). However, after examining the entire position with regard to the Memorandum No.VI/401/1/5/2019 dated 10.10.2019, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Verma (supra) has directed as follows:-

¶19

"4. In spite of the clear wordings in the Memo, the High Court by the order impugned herein came to a conclusion that the office Memorandum is contrary to the statutory position and proceeded to dismiss the Writ Petition.

¶20

5. We have heard Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, appearing for the appellant as also Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India. Mr. K.M. Natraj, learned Additional Solicitor General submits that the approach adopted by the High Court that the Office Memorandum is contrary to the statutory positions and is not supported by law and it is also not the stand of the Union of India. Learned Additional Solicitor General expressed no difficulty in processing the application of the appellant on the basis of the Office Memorandum.

¶21

6. In this view of the matter, it is sufficient for us to direct the authorities to consider the application for renewal of the passport on the basis of Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2019 or any other subsequent Office Memorandums that may govern the field notwithstanding the order passed by the High Court in Writ Petition(C) No.6450/2024 dated 28.02.2024, upon making of an appropriate application, the same shall be disposed of, as expeditiously as possible."

¶22

6 . In light of the above finding(s) of Hon'ble Supreme Court, we are of the view that the authorities are required to consider the application of the petitioner for re-issuance of passport on the basis of Office Memorandum dated 10.10.2019 or any other subsequent office memorandum that may govern the field as the Hon'ble Supreme Court has finally dealt with this issue in Rita Verma (supra) . The law

¶23

WRIC No. 4236 of 2026

¶24

3

¶25

laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rita Verma (supra) shall apply in the present case, therefore, we direct the authorities to act expeditiously in accordance with law in the subject matter.

¶26

7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶27

May 7, 2026 Praveen

¶28

(Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶29

Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ahmad Abdulla v. U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ahmad Abdulla v. U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Tiwari vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and Another

Mohd.Shamim vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and 2 Others

Wahidul Hasan Beg vs U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi and Another

M/S Rise and Shine Enterprises Thru. Its Proprietor Harshit Saraf vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Tax and Registration Lko. and 2 Others

Dcb Bank Ltd.Thr.Authorized Representative Mr.Sumit Kumar vs District Magistrate District Lucknow and 6 Others

Bhoop Nrayan Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. and 6 Others