Raj Bahadur v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/42056/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition called out; none appeared for the petitioner while State counsel was present. In view of the Bar Association resolution dated 13.01.2026 against passing adverse orders, the case was passed over and directed to be listed fresh on 29 January 2026.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
WRIT - C No. - 42056 of 2025
¶3
Raj Bahadur
¶4
.....Petitioner(s)
¶5
Versus
¶6
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
¶7
.....Respondent(s)
¶8
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
¶9
Court No. - 55
¶10
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
¶11
- Case called out in the revised list. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents is present.
¶12
- However, in the light of the Resolution of High Court Bar Association dated 13.01.2026 with regard to "no adverse order", the case is passed over for today.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Raj Bahadur
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Kunal Ravi Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/42056/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Siddharth Nandan
- Order 2 — this page · Siddharth Nandan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court