Writ petition against orders of the Prescribed Authority, Lucknow Development Authority. The court held the orders were appealable and declined to entertain the writ, disposing of it with liberty to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 2404 of 2026
Sanjay Kumar Verma And Another
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Prescribed Authority Lucknow Development Authority Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Dubey, Ankit Dubey, Swati Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ratnesh Chandra
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
(Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
February 27, 2026
Shanu/-
Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition was maintainable when the impugned orders were appealable and an alternate remedy existed?
Sanjay Kumar Verma And Another
Prescribed Authority Lucknow Development Authority Lko. And Another
Rajan Roy
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
