Allowed¶13

Surendra Pal Verma v. Union of India Thru. Secy. Railway Board New Delhi and 2 Others

Allahabad HC17 Apr 2026WRIC/1939/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; Writ - C No. 1939 of 2026; I.A. No.2 of 2026 recall application; dismissal for default; non-appearance of petitioner on 17.04.2026; sufficient cause shown; order recalled; writ petition restored to original number; listing after two weeks as fresh; Surendra Pal Verma; Union of India; Railway Board; Shekhar B. Saraf, J.; Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, J.; order dated May 22, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Recall application allowed; order dated 17.04.2026 recalled; writ petition restored to its original number and directed to be listed after two weeks as fresh. ¶13

Surendra Pal Verma vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Railway Board New Delhi and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 1939 of 2026

Surendra Pal Verma

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Union Of India Thru. Secy. Delhi And 2 Others	Railway Board New	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Mahesh Prasad, Pankaj Prasoon, Rajesh Kumar	Durgesh Kumar Rawat, Pramod Kumar Rawat,
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: A.S.G.I.

¶7

Court No. - 3

¶8

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.

¶9

I.A. No.2 of 2026 (Recall Application)

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

¶11

This is an application for recalling of the order dated 17.04.2026 whereby the writ petition was dismissed for default, as none was present on behalf of the petitioner.

¶12

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the affidavit accompanying the application, we find that sufficient cause has been shown for non appearance of the petitioner on 17.04.2026.

¶13

Accordingly, the recall application is allowed. The order dated

¶14

17.04.2026 is recalled.

¶15

The petition is restored to its original number.

¶16

Order on Writ Petition

¶17

List this matter after two weeks as fresh.

¶18

(Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶19

May 22, 2026 Ashutosh

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Surendra Pal Verma v. Union of India Thru. Secy. Railway Board New Delhi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Pal Verma v. Union of India Thru. Secy. Railway Board New Delhi and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ijamamul Haq vs Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of External Affairs Govtt. of India and 4 Others

Mahanth Dinesh Das Alias Dinesh Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tourism Lko. and 4 Others

Sarwar Jahan vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Manju Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Kanchan vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Agriculture Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Nasimun vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko. U.P. and 4 Others