Disposed¶18

Committee of Management, Shikarpur Siksha Vikas Samiti and Another v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Allahabad HC17 May 2026WRIC/19262/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Shikarpur Siksha Vikas Samiti; society election dispute; bye-law amendment objection; parallel election; direction to Respondent No. 2 to decide objections within two months; writ petition disposed; Allahabad High Court; WRIT-C 19262 of 2026; Siddharth Nandan, J.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to conclude the objection proceedings initiated by the notice dated 24.12.2025, preferably within two months from service of the certified copy of the order. ¶18

Committee of Management, Shikarpur Siksha Vikas Samiti and Another Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 19262 of 2026

¶3

Committee Of Management, Shikarpur Siksha Vikas Samiti And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petition....er(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma, Mahesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.

¶6

Court No. - 38

¶7

HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.

¶8

Sri Mahesh Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

¶9

In view of the order proposed to be passed at this stage, notices to respondents No. 5 to 9 are dispensed with.

¶10

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the last election was held on 01.06.2025, and the papers were transmitted to Respondent No. 2. Subsequently, certain amendments were made to the bye-laws of the Society on 12.11.2025, which were also forwarded on 28.11.2025. He further submits that an objection was filed on 22.12.2025 by the respondent No. 7 and one Rakesh Sharma, who is not a member of the Society, and that they had set up a parallel election.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid, a notice was issued on 24.12.2025 by Respondent No. 2, to which he had also submitted replies on 05.01.2026 and 25.02.2026, but no further proceedings have taken place."

¶12

During the pendency of the aforesaid proceedings, as per the allegations of the petitioners, the respondents have taken forceful possession of the institution run by the Society. A complaint was also made before the police authorities on 17.03.2026, and a suit for injunction has also been filed.

¶13

However, he submits that, in case the objection filed by the respondents

¶14

WRIC No. 19262 of 2026

¶15

¶16

vis-à-vis the election dated 01.06.2025 and the amendment dated 12.11.2025 is brought to its logical end by respondent No. 2, the controversy can be settled; the learned Standing Counsel has no objection.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid, Respondent No. 2 is directed to conclude the proceedings initiated by the issuance of the notice dated 24.12.2025 expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the service of the certified copy of this order.

¶18

With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶19

(Siddharth Nandan,J.)

¶20

May 18, 2026

¶21

piyush

¶22

Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Committee of Management, Shikarpur Siksha Vikas Samiti and Another v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Committee of Management, Shikarpur Siksha Vikas Samiti and Another v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Honey vs State of U.P. and Another

Suchit Kumar Dixit vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Suchit Kumar Dixit Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Md. Tasneem Reza Vs Aligarh Muslim University and Another

Smt. Shabnam Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Mahendrapal Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others