Disposed¶14

Babloo v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026WRIC/17846/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Alternative remedy bar; writ petition disposed of with liberty; order dated 26.10.2023 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; appeal under Section 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006; restoration application; Babloo v. State of Uttar Pradesh; Allahabad High Court; Manish Kumar Nigam, J.; decision dated May 6, 2026; WRIT - C No. 17846 of 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available to him under law (restoration application and/or appeal under Section 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006); certified copy of the orders, if any, to be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopy. ¶14

Babloo vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 17846 of 2026

Babloo

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others

¶7

		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Radheshyam Verma	Yadav, Surendra Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Rame	shwar Prasad Shukla

¶8

Court No. - 36

¶9

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶11

The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 26.10.2023 passed in proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶12

Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing restoration application as well as an appeal under Section 67(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006.

¶13

Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.

¶14

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law.

¶15

Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same.

¶16

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

¶17

May 6, 2026 Ved Prakash

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Babloo v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babloo v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Durgawati Vs State of U.P. and 14 Others

Lalta Prasad Pandey Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 17 Others

Suresh Chandra Vs the State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ramratan Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Naresh Bal Bhatnagar Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Bachcheram @ Bachchelal Yadav vs State of U.P. and 6 Others