Dismissed¶11

Subhash Chand Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others

Allahabad HC10 Feb 2026WRIC/17280/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ - C No. 17280 of 2013, Subhash Chand Prasad v. State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, decided October 6, 2025 by Saral Srivastava and Sudhanshu Chauhan, JJ. Petition dismissed for want of prosecution on non-appearance of the petitioner; interim order, if any, vacated. No merits adjudication, no ratio laid down, no statutory provisions or precedents cited. Petitioner's counsel: H.P. Mishra; respondent counsel: Ashish Kumar Awasthi, Tanisha Srivastava, Dhananjay Jahangir Monir.

What did the court decide?

Interim order, if any, stands vacated. ¶11

Subhash Chand Prasad Vs State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 17280 of 2013

Subhash Chand Prasad

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others

¶7

		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: H.P. Mishra
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Ashish Kumar Awasthi, Tanisha	Srivastava, Dhananjay Jahangir Monir

¶8

Court No. - 40

¶9

HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

¶10

List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.

¶11

Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶12

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

¶13

October 6, 2025 Sattyarth

¶14

(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Subhash Chand Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Chand Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases