Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner when the list was revised; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 17280 of 2013
Subhash Chand Prasad
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others
| .....Respondent(s) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : H.P. Mishra |
|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : Ashish Kumar Awasthi, Tanisha |
Srivastava, Dhananjay Jahangir Monir |
Court No. - 40
HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
October 6, 2025 Sattyarth
(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Subhash Chand Prasad
State Of U.P. Thru Secy.
Others
Saral Srivastava
Sudhanshu Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
