Disposed¶15

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited v. State of Up and 5 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026WRIC/16396/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited v. State of U.P. and others; WRIT - C No. 16396 of 2026; Allahabad High Court; demarcation of Arazi No. 481 (minzumla plot); claim of 1000 sq. mtr. of land; Kanpur Development Authority Committee of six revenue officials; order dated 29.05.2025; writ petition disposed of without entering merits; expectation of expeditious completion of demarcation; decided 06.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with the expectation that the demarcation proceeding before the Committee constituted by the Kanpur Development Authority be completed expeditiously; no adjudication on merits. ¶15

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited vs State of Up and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 16396 of 2026

¶3

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Up And 5 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ashok K Pandey,	Shrish Kumar Jaiswal
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Abhinava Krishn	a Srivastava, C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 21

¶10

HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.

¶11

Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey and Sri Shrish Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Hare Ram Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for Kanpur Development Authority.

¶12

The grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed, even though, the Kanpur Development Authority has also proceeded to constitute a Committee consisting of revenue officials for actual demarcation of Arazi No. 481, which is minzumla plot, out of which 1000 sq. mtr. of land has been claimed by the petitioner.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner has confined the relief to the extent that a direction be issued to the respondent authority for ensuring the actual demarcation of the holdings expeditiously, in the light of order dated 29.05.2025.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances and the relief, as prayed for, without adverting on merit of the case, we find that once the Kanpur Development Authority has already proceeded to constitute a Committee consisting six revenue officials, we expect that the proceeding must be completed expeditiously. Needless to say that we have not adverted on the merit of the matter.

¶15

The writ petition stands disposed of .

¶16

May 6, 2026 gp

¶17

(Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited v. State of Up and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanpur Colonisers Private Limited v. State of Up and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Harish Chandra and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Chhatar Pal Sharma and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Adityaagarwal and 22 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vikram and 26 Others vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Rajkumar and 32 Others vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Akhilesh Kumar Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and 5 Others