Writ petition challenging civil court orders dismissed due to defects in selecting the wrong constitutional article (227 instead of 226 for certiorari) and impleading the civil court. Leave granted to file a corrected petition.
None granted; leave to file corrected petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 1570 of 2026
Hariram Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Addl. Distt. Judge Xth Distt. Faizabad Now Ayodhya And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ishwar Dutt Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pradeep Kumar Singh Vats
Court No. - 17
HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
WRIC No. 1570 of 2026
2
Court as opposite parties to the petition whereas the civil courts cannot be impleaded as opposite parties to the petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
March 10, 2026 -Amit K-
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Hariram Pandey
Addl. Distt. Judge Xth Distt. Faizabad Now Ayodhya
Others
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
