Disposed¶14

Anees Fatma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC5 May 2026WRIC/14725/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (WRIT - C No. 14725 of 2026, Allahabad High Court, decided May 5, 2026) disposed of; representation dated 01.01.2026 to District Magistrate regarding disturbance of waqf property by private respondent no. 3 held considered and acted upon per State instructions dated 20.03.2026; no further order made.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner's representation has been considered and action taken; the petitioner was made aware through copy of the State's instructions given to his learned advocate. ¶13

Anees Fatma vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 14725 of 2026

Anees Fatma

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Mushir Khan
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 29

¶10

HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

¶11

Mr. Mohd. Alam, learned advocate holding the brief appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, private respondent no. 3 is creating disturbance in the waqf property. His client made representation dated 1st January, 2026, to the District Magistrate. Prayer is for direction that representation be considered and action taken.

¶12

Mr. Vijay Pratap Singh, learned advocate Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. He hands up his instructions dated 20th March, 2026 with copy to Mr. Mohd. Alam. He submits, his instructions discloses action taken by communication issued to private respondent nos. 3 and 4, on complaint made by petitioner.

¶13

Petitioner's representation has been considered and action taken. Petitioner has been made aware on copy of the instructions given to his learned advocate. In the circumstances, no further order is to be made.

¶14

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶15

May 5, 2026 Vikram

¶16

(Arindam Sinha,J.)

¶17

(Satya Veer Singh,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anees Fatma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anees Fatma v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Matsajivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. and 2 Other Vs State of U.P. and 8 Other

Umesh Kumar vs State Public Service Tribunal and 3 Others

Shubham Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Subhash Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 Others

Shiv Sharan Mishra vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Matsajivi Sahkari Samiti Ltd. and 2 Other vs State of U.P. and 8 Other