Disposed¶13

Jamuna Prasad and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC20 Apr 2026WRIC/14683/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Writ - C No. 14683 of 2026; Jamuna Prasad v. State of U.P.; maintainability of writ petition in private dispute; mandamus; illegal construction over agricultural land; Gata No. 33; Village Baraulaha; Tehsil Chayal; Police Station Charwa; District Kaushambi; U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 remedy; petition disposed of with liberty; single judge Manish Kumar Nigam, J.; April 20, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to seek relief as available to them under provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. ¶13

Jamuna Prasad and Another vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 14683 of 2026

¶2

Jamuna Prasad And Another

¶3

.....Petitioner(s)

¶4

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others			.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ajay Vinda	Kumar Giri, Giri	Surendra Kumar,
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶5

Court No. - 36

¶6

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:

¶9

"Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 to ensure the Safety of land of the petitioners Gata No. 33 situated at Village Baraulaha, Tehsil Chayal, Police Station Charwa, District- Kaushambi and stop the illegal construction raising by the respondent No. 4 to 6."

¶10

From the perusal of the averment made in the writ petition as well as prayer, it is apparent that the dispute of the petitioner is with private persons/respondents.

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that such a writ petition is not maintainable for a private dispute.

¶12

In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶13

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to seek relief as available to them under provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶14

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

¶15

April 20, 2026 Ved Prakash

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jamuna Prasad and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamuna Prasad and Another v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Narendra Singh Gangwar Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 2 Others

Ramesh Singh @ Rameshchand Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Arvind Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ravindra Patel vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Ramesh Singh @ Rameshchand vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Pravesh Kumar and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 4 Others