Disposed¶11

Keshav Prashad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2026WRIB/1324/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court WRIT - B 1324 of 2026, Keshav Prashad v. State of U.P.; direction for time-bound disposal of Revenue Revision No. 2217 of 2025 before Board of Revenue, Prayagraj; revision heard twice (6.6.2025 and 18.8.2025, reserved) without admission/rejection order; next date 25.5.2026 fixed by order dated 23.3.2026; writ disposed with mandate to decide revision within six months of certified copy; expedition of pending revenue revision; adjournment without justifiable reasons.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2 (Board of Revenue, Prayagraj) to decide Revision No. 2217 of 2025 itself in accordance with law within six months from presentation of a certified copy of the order. ¶11

Keshav Prashad Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - B No. - 1324 of 2026

¶3

Keshav Prashad

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ashutosh Kumar Gupta, Bhriguram Ji, Deo Brat Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 55

¶6

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶7

Heard Sri Anand Kumar holding brief of Sri Bhriguram Ji Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4.

¶8

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2, Board of Revenue at Prayagraj to expedite the hearing of Revision No. 2217 of 2025, pending before it.

¶9

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on 6.6.2025 the revision filed by the petitioner was heard and order was passed issuing notices and summoning record of the court below. On 18.8.2025, the counsel for the parties were heard and the matter was reserved for orders. However, a perusal of the order, dated 23.3.2026, annexed alongwith the supplementary affidavit filed today in Court, shows that respondent no. 2 has again fixed 25.5.2026, as the next date, for hearing on the admission of the revision, summoning the records of the court below.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that twice the matter was heard but no orders were passed admitting or rejecting the revision filed by the petitioner. The revision is being adjourned for no justifiable reasons, therefore, a time frame may be fixed for early disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with the

¶12

WRIB No. 1324 of 2026

¶13

¶14

direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the aforementioned Revision, itself, in accordance with law, within a period of six months, from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.

¶15

(Arun Kumar,J.)

¶16

April 20, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu

¶17

Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Keshav Prashad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Keshav Prashad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shambhu Nath vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Abu Umar vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Istekar vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Raja Vs State of U.P. and 23 Others

Sri Rama Shanker Lal Vs D.D.C.and Others

Ravindra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others