Disposed¶16

Raj Narayan Shukla v. State of Up and 3 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026WRIA/5877/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regularization of service; writ petition disposed of; impugned order dated 31.12.2025 set aside; remand to concerned respondent for fresh order in terms of Vinod Kumar Srivastava (Writ-A No.21492 of 2023, dated 30.9.2024) and Government Order dated 4.10.2024; reliance on Tej Pal Singh, Writ-A No.7464 of 2019, 2024:AHC:197402; State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; single Judge Saurabh Shyam Shamshery; decided May 6, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 31.12.2025 set aside; matter remanded to the concerned respondent to pass a fresh order in terms of the direction in Vinod Kumar Srivastava (supra) and the Government Order dated 4.10.2024; writ petition disposed of with the aforesaid direction. ¶16

Raj Narayan Shukla vs State of Up and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 5877 of 2026

Raj Narayan Shukla

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of Up And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Amar Nath Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 32

¶10

HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for respondents.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner refers a judgment passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ-A No.7464 of 2019, Tej Pal Singh Vs. Vs.State of U.P. & Ors, Neutral Citation No.2024:AHC:197402 which was allowed with a direction to pass a fresh order for regularization in terms of judgment passed in Vinod Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. & Ors, (Writ-A No.21492 of 2023) dated 30.9.2024 .

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that same order may be passed in the present case, since the facts are similar.

¶14

Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has not been able to dispute the above submissions.

¶15

Considering the above submissions, and taking note of judgment passed in Tej Pal Singh (supra), impugned order dated 31.12.2025 is set-aside and matter is remanded to the concerned respondent to pass a fresh order in terms of direction passed by this Court in Vinod Kumar Srivastava (supra) as well as Government Order dated 4.10.2024.

¶16

With aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of .

¶17

(Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.)

¶18

May 6, 2026

¶19

N. Sinha

¶20

Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Raj Narayan Shukla v. State of Up and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Narayan Shukla v. State of Up and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ripunjay Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Dr Neelam Singh Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Sangeeta Agarwal Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sushil Kumar vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ravindra Nath Singh vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Abu Talah vs State of U.P. and 3 Others