Dismissed¶10

Mahendra Pal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC15 Apr 2026WRIA/5273/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, WRIT - A No. - 5273 of 2026, Mahendra Pal v. State Of U.P. And 3 Others, decided May 7, 2026 by Prakash Padia, J. Dismissal of writ petition as infructuous; petitioner reinstated in service on contractual basis by Chief Medical Officer, Banda vide order dated 23.04.2026; challenge was to CMO Banda's order dated 31.03.2026; no substantive adjudication on merits; no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Since the petitioner had already been reinstated in service on contractual basis by the Chief Medical Officer, Banda's order dated 23.04.2026, the relief sought had been granted and no further orders were required. ¶9

Mahendra Pal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 5273 of 2026

¶3

Mahendra Pal

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others		.....	Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Birendra Singh, Singh	Ratan	Singh, Swati
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Pranjal M	ehrotra
Court No.- 6

¶6

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

¶7

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to quash the order dated 31.03.2026 passed by the Chief Medical Officer, Banda.

¶8

2 . Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, counsel for the petitioner placed before this Court an order dated 23.04.2026 passed by the Chief Medical Officer, Banda by which the petitioner has been reinstated in his services on contractual basis.

¶9

3 . In this view of the matter, it is argued by the counsel for the petitioner that relief sought by the petitioner has already been granted to him, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed and the present writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶10

4 . Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous .

¶11

(Prakash Padia,J.)

¶12

May 7, 2026

¶13

Swati

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mahendra Pal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Pal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Hargovind Singh Yadav vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kamlesh Singh vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ramu Lal vs State of Up and 4 Others

Rajesh Singh Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Sanjay Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Satish Chandra Mishra vs State of U.P. and 2 Others