Dismissed¶11
Satish Chandra Shukla v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Writ Petition – Dismissal for want of prosecution – None appeared for the petitioner
Allahabad HCWRIA/4678/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.) in WRIT - A No. 4678 of 2026, Satish Chandra Shukla v. State of U.P. and 2 Others (decided May 6, 2026): writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared for the petitioner, with Rs. 1,000/- cost payable to the High Court Legal Services Committee; restoration applications to be entertained only with proof of payment of cost; interim order, if any, vacated.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution, with cost of Rs. 1000/- to be deposited in the Bank account of the High Court Legal Services Committee, as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. ¶11